Showing posts with label organization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label organization. Show all posts

Friday, June 2, 2017

Types of Values – Instrumental Values and Terminal Values

INSTRUMENTAL VALUES and  TERMINAL VALUES
THE TWO TYPES OF VALUES 
Management Musings
By
VIKRAM KARVE

Values are of two types  both in the personal and organizational domains. 

The two types of values are:

1. INSTRUMENTAL VALUES

and 

2. TERMINAL VALUES


INSTRUMENTAL VALUES

Instrumental Values are core values.

Instrumental Values are permanent in nature.

Instrumental Values comprise personal characteristics and character traits.

Instrumental Values refer to preferable modes of behaviour and include values like honesty, sincerity, ambition, independence, obedience, imaginativeness, courageousness, competitiveness  and also some negative traits too. 

Organisations also have Instrumental Values (which can be ascertained from the organizational culture).

Whether at personal level or organizational level – instrumental values are permanent in nature – and so – instrumental values are difficult to change. 

For example  the instrumental values of a PSU will differ from that of an MNC – though both may be in the same business.

Since they are permanent in nature – Instrumental Values are difficult to change.


TERMINAL VALUES

In our personal lives  Terminal Values are those things that we work towards – or those things we think are most important – or things that we feel are most desirable. 

Terminal Values are desirable states of existence. 

Terminal Values include things like happiness, self respect, family security, recognition, freedom, inner harmony, comfortable life, professional excellence, etc

In a nutshell  Terminal Values signify the objectives of the life of a person – the ultimate things the person wants to achieve through his or her behaviour (the destination he wants to reach in life). 

In contrast  Instrumental Values indicate the methods an individual would like to adopt for achieving his life’s aim (the path he would like to take to reach his destination).

This applies to organisations as well  and  organizations too exhibit Terminal Values. 

However  Terminal Values can be changed  and this change in Terminal Values can sometimes be seen – when there is a change of Top Management or CEO.


Read this Before you take up a Job 
(or Before Recruiting a Candidate for a Job)


ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES AND ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOUR

Organisational Values are the key to organisational behaviour. 

So  before you join an organization you must ensure that there is no conflict in your Instrumental Values  and – the organization’s Instrumental Values 

Yes – there must be no conflict between the Employees and Employers Instrumental Values – since – Instrumental Values are difficult to change

Conversely  the organisation must consider this aspect while interviewing a prospective candidate for recruitment to avoid conflict of Instrumental Values.

However  any mismatch in Terminal Values can be corrected by suitable Induction Training  since Terminal Values can be inculcated or realigned or changed. 

VIKRAM KARVE
Copyright © Vikram Karve 
1. If you share this post, please give due credit to the author Vikram Karve
2. Please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Please DO NOT Cut/Copy/Paste this post
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Disclaimer:
1. These are my personal views based on my personal experience. Please do your own due diligence while selecting a training philosophy.
2. All stories in this blog are a work of fiction. Events, Places, Settings and Incidents narrated in the stories are a figment of my imagination. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

Copyright Notice:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.

Copyright © Vikram Karve (all rights reserved)

This is an abridged, upgraded and revised version of my lecture on VALUES written be me Vikram Karve more than 25 years ago in the early 1990s and posted online earlier a number of times in my various blogs including in my Academic and Creative Writing Journal Blog in 2011 at url: http://karvediat.blogspot.in/2011/12/instrumental-values-and-terminal-values.html  and https://karve.wordpress.com/2012/11/22/instrumental-values-and-terminal-values-the-two-types-of-personal-and-organizational-values/ etc

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

CATWOE Stakeholder Model of Soft Systems Management

THE SOFT SYSTEMS APPROACH
ROOT DEFINITION and CATWOE MODEL
By
VIKRAM KARVE


The first step in Soft Systems Methodology ( SSM ) is to formulate the Root Definition of the System you are studying, analysing, designing, evaluating or even quality assuring, inspecting or certifying.

ROOT DEFINITION

A Root Definition is a structured description of a system. It is a clear statement of activities which take place (or might take place) in the organisation being studied.
 
A properly structured root definition comprises three elements [what, how, why] and is of the form: 

A System to do X, by (means of) Y, in order to achieve Z.

X – What the System does
– How it does it
– Why it is being done

The 'what' is the immediate aim of the system,
The 'how' is the means of achieving that aim,
The 'why' is the longer term aim of the purposeful activity.

CATWOE analysis helps in proper formulation of a Root Definition.

CATWOE is a mnemonic which helps identify and categorize all stakeholders [people, processes, environment, entities] of the System being analysed for formulating the Root Definition.

CATWOE MODEL 

C = CUSTOMERS OR CLIENTS
A = ACTORS OR AGENTS
T = TRANSFORMATION PROCESS
W =WELTANSCHAUUNG or WORLD VIEW
OWNERS
E = ENVIRONMENT

To elaborate a bit:

C: The ‘customers of the system’ , clients or System Beneficiaries. In this context ‘customers’ means those who are on the receiving end of whatever it is that the system does. Is it clear from your definition of “C” as to who are the beneficiaries of the system?

A: The ‘actors’, meaning those who would actually carry out the activities envisaged in the notional system being defined. Actors transform inputs into outputs.

T: The ‘transformation process’. What does the system do to the inputs to convert them into the outputs?

W: Weltanschauung - The ‘world view’ that lies behind the Root Definition; the perspective from which the Root Definition if formulated. Putting the system into its wider context can highlight the consequences of the overall system. For example the system may be in place to assist in making the world environmentally safer, and the consequences of system failure could be significant pollution.

O: The ‘owner(s)’ – The person(s) who has commissioned the system and who has sufficient formal power over the system to stop it existing if they so wished (though they won’t usually want to do this).

E: The ‘environmental constraints’. These include things such as ethical limits, regulations, financial constraints, resource limitations, limits set by terms of reference, and so on.


CATWOE Analysis yields a more elaborate all encompassing Root Definition of the form:

A System owned by O to do W by A by means of T given the constraints of in order to achieve X for C.

A briefer version of Root Definition is:  a T system in which do W for C 


Illustrative Example of application of CATWOE Model 


EDUCATION SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATION
 
Here is a CATWOE Model of a hypothetical Higher Education System [a University or College]:

C – Students
A – Teachers
T – School Pass Outs are transformed into Graduates [Degree Holders]
W – Graduation [a Degree] is a means of assurance to potential employers that the Graduate [Degree Holder] possesses a specified standard of proficiency and skills in the domain of qualification.
O – The University or College Governing Body or Top Management
E – The Prescribed Educational, Academic Quality, Assessment and Accreditation Standards and Requirements.

Now this CATWOE Analysis may yield a Root Definition that this particular Higher Education Institution is a university owned system to award degrees to students (X) who successfully qualify assessment (Y) in accordance with prescribed standards in order to certify assurance (Z) to potential employers that the students possess the requisite proficiency, capabilities and skills. 
 
Is this Root Definition okay or is there something amiss...?

Suppose we define Potential Employers [or Industry] as CUSTOMERS [C] and include students as ACTORS [A] along with teachers – won’t we then get a more apt Root Definition and consequently realise a better Educational System in keeping with current needs and ground reality...?

It is vital to accord apt attention to optimizing the System Root Definition for the System under consideration for best results and in this the CATWOE Model is very helpful.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

At a recent alumni meet of a prestigious Engineering College I asked a few recently passed out alumni [who were working for a leading IT company for just over a year] as to how much of what was taught in his four year Engineering Degree Course in his college was useful in his work.

They said: “Less than 5% (five percent)” – which means that his employer had to invest heavily [almost 95%] in his training and the rest he had to learn on the job. 
 
Maybe the educational institution needs to introspect and have a relook at its CATWOE Model and reformulate its ROOT DEFINITION and restructure its curriculum and revitalize its pedagogic methodology to meet the challenges of current needs and envisage seamless integration of fresh BE and B. Tech. Engineering Graduates into the industry.

Systems Approach to higher education incorporating increased partnership and congruence between the industry and universities is the sine qua non of optimal human resource development in science and technology.


The disconnect between the industry and the educational system must be bridged. The Soft Systems Approach incorporating the CATWOE Model is ideally suited for analysing and optimising education systems since all education systems are Human Activity System (HAS) and not Hard Systems.


THE SOFT SYSTEMS APPROACH
ROOT DEFINITION and CATWOE MODEL 
By 
VIKRAM KARVE

This article written by me in 1991 and posted online by me a number of times including at url: http://karvediat.blogspot.in/2011/08/system-analysis-soft-approach.html

Copyright © Vikram Karve 1991
Vikram Karve has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work.
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Management of the Absurd – Contrarian Wisdom

MANAGEMENT OF THE ABSURD – CONTRARIAN WISDOM” 

One Cardinal Principle I learnt in the Navy was: 

“Never ask your subordinates to do something that you cannot do yourself.” 

It will be advisable for politicians and officers (who have a penchant to bark out orders which are unimplementable) to abide by this principle. 

Another principle (a corollary to the cardinal principle) I followed was: 

It is always better to SHOW people how to do things – rather than TELL them how to do it. 

So – before you gave a task to sailors – as an officer – you should KNOW how to do that task – and  when you want to train your sailors – you should practically demonstrate the procedure to your sailors and SHOW them how to do the task (rather than just tell them how to do it). 

I tried to follow these principles in the Navy – so that I knew the extent of the task I was giving my subordinates – and they knew that I was professionally proficient.

When I became a Teacher/Trainer – the first assignment I gave to my students/trainees was to write a Book Review – and – then – after I was satisfied with their book reviews – I made all students give a presentation on their Book Reviews to the entire group of students/trainees and faculty.

This ensured that my students/trainees read at least one book on the subject – and – it also gave me an idea of their communication skills – so that I could take corrective action. 

In accordance with my principles enunciated above (that I should know and show how to do a thing before telling others to do it) I learnt how to review books and started writing Book Reviews myself to demonstrate that I could review books.

Prior to the advent of the internet – my book reviews were published in various professional journals and also in our in-house magazines. 

After the arrival of internet – I created my own Book Review Blogs” where I would post my reviews.

As a Teacher/Trainer – I taught Engineering/Technology/Management – and – hence – during those days – most of my book reviews pertain to books on those subjects.

Later – as I meandered into creative writing – I started reviewing books of different genres – Fiction (novels, anthologies etc) – Philosophy – Biographies – History – Military Literature – Self Help Books  et al.

Here is a Book Review of a Management Book which I wrote around 17 years ago in the year 1999. 

It is a very interesting Book on Management called Management of the Absurd by Richard Farson.

Read on...

EXAMPLES OF MANAGEMENT PARADOXES  Absurd Yet True 
Book Review
By
 
VIKRAM KARVE
 


Leafing through my beloved books on my bookshelves is one of my favorite pastimes. 

I love the company, the smell, and, the feel of books  as I leisurely browse and glance through the varied books I have collected over the years. 

And then – after browsing for some time  I select one of my beloved books for perusal.

This morning I picked up a delightful management classic called Management of the Absurd by Richard Farson. 

I acquired my copy on 06 May 1999 at the Pune Book Fair. 

(I have this peculiar habit of writing down the Date and Place whenever a buy a Book). 

Management of the Absurd is a laconic book which explores the paradoxes of management in an extremely witty manner.

Let us browse through this wonderful book...

Book Details

TITLE: MANAGEMENT OF THE ABSURD

AUTHOR: RICHARD FARSON

PUBLISHED: 1996 TOUCHSTONE NEW YORK

ISBN 0-684-80080-2

In his foreword Michael Crichton writes: “In this book Richard Farson reports more than experience; he gives us … wisdom”.

The 172 page book has eight parts and thirty three chapters, and as the author says in the introduction, these chapters need not necessarily be read in sequence, but in whatever order appeals to the reader. 

So, Dear Reader, let’s do just that.

“Morale is unrelated to Productivity” the author says chapter in 27, turning conventional HR wisdom on its head. 

He deprecates management practices of pampering and mollycoddling employees, giving gifts, holding parties, recognizing birthdays, gestures of goodwill and other HR gimmicks designed to court employee favor as a calculated morale-raising strategy. 

Self-actualized people, who were among the greatest achievers in our society, were not necessarily comfortable or happy; they could be ruthless, boring, stuffy, irritating, and humorless and organizations are absolutely dependent on such people. 

You don’t agree, or do you...?

Sounds like a web of contradictions, isn't it...?

That’s why you must read this book, which turns topsy turvy the conventional wisdom you may have learnt during your MBA at B-School. 

This book certainly gives you something to think about.

Effective Managers are not in Control  says the author, as he emphasizing the concept that a leader must have occasional vulnerability.  

Absurdly, our most important human affairs – marriage, child rearing, education, leadership – do best when there is occasional loss of control and an increase in personal vulnerability, the author opines, drawing a parallel between leadership and romance. 

If you know how to have a romance, it isn’t a romance, but a seduction

Not knowing how to do it makes it a romance.

It is the same for leadership, an intangible quality, where management techniques don’t work. That's why leadership can't be taught. 

Genuineness in relationships is the only way to lead professionals.

Training leads to the development of skills and techniques, and suggests the possibility of control. 

Education leads to information and knowledge, which suggests the possibility of understanding, even wisdom. 

Wisdom involves humility, compassion and respect – essential to effective leadership...

What is the difference between Training and Education?

Let me tell you in a nutshell:

Training makes people more alike

whereas

Education tends to make people different from each other


So the first benefit of education is that the manager becomes unique and independent

“Don't try to train leaders. Educate them...!” the author exhorts.

Planning is an ineffective way to bring about change. 

Too often planning is an empty ritual designed to make management feel there is something going on in that area.

There are paradoxes and paradoxes, absurdities and absurdities...in this delightful book...!

Sample this: Individuals are strong, but organizations are not...! 

Till I read this book I was given to understand that it was the other way around, and the organisation is paramount and individuals indispensable. 

After observation and contemplation I now realize that it is individuals that make an organization  yes  individuals are strongorganizations are not.

The better things are, the worse they feel  says the theory of rising expectations.

That is why we perform better in adversity.

The Theory of Rising Expectations works in personal life too.

That is why good marriages are more likely to fail than bad ones.

And second marriages are better than first marriages, but shorter...!

In communication, form is more important than content, praising people does not motivate them, and the more we communicate, the less we "communicate".

The ‘meat’ of the book is the chapter on – The “Technology” of Human Relations. 

Exploring the impact of Technology on Human Relations, the author discusses how technology invents us, develops a life of its own and with every application of technology a counter-force develops that is the exact opposite of what we intended. 

The danger is that we become so in love with technological applications that we forget its detrimental effects. 

He illustrates his point with examples of how computer technology increases design capability but stifles creativity

We must focus on Relationship Enrichment rather than acquisition of techniques of management skills, he suggests, since the more important a relationshipthe lesser the management skills matter.

The book is replete with startling insights.

The author states his message in his introduction:

“I believe many programs in management training today are moving us in the wrong direction because they fail to appreciate the complexity and paradoxical nature of human organizations. Thinking loses out to how-to-do-it formulas and techniques, if not to slogans and homilies, as the principal management guides.”

This is a refreshing, original and thought provoking book  something different from the run-of-the-mill stuff. 

This book presents a unique perspective of management theories  sometimes turning conventional management wisdom topsy-turvy on its head.

Management of the Absurd is a management classic  a rare gem in the plethora of management literature. 

Do read this insightful book – you will be glad you did. 

VIKRAM KARVE
Copyright © Vikram Karve 
1. If you share this post, please give due credit to the author Vikram Karve
2. Please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Please DO NOT Cut/Copy/Paste this post
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Disclaimer:
1. I have expressed my thoughts and interpretation in this book review. Readers are requested to derive their own interpretations.
2. All stories in this blog are a work of fiction. Events, Places, Settings and Incidents narrated in the stories are a figment of my imagination. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

Copyright Notice:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.
Copyright © Vikram Karve (All Rights Reserved)
     
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.