Showing posts with label armed forces. Show all posts
Showing posts with label armed forces. Show all posts

Friday, December 13, 2019

Humor in Uniform – Musings of a “Superseded” Officer – Part 2 – Fulfillment after Supersession


Humor in Uniform

Musings of a “Superseded” Officer
by
Vikram Karve 

Continued from Part 1 – Supersession Day – url: http://karvediat.blogspot.com/2017/05/supersession-day-musings-of-written-off.html

Part 2

Fulfillment after Supersession 

In my previous blog post – I told you that when you are “passed over” for promotion and “superseded” – you have 3 choices:

1. You can Quit the Service immediately by Resigning your Commission (even if it means giving up your pension and forgoing/losing many benefits)

2. You can wait for a few years to complete 20 years pensionable service – and then seek Premature Retirement (PMR).

3. You can serve till you attain the age of “superannuation” (Earlier the minimum superannuation age was 54 years – but I understand that this has now been increased to 57 years – and some officers continue for a few more years on “re-employment”)

This article is for those “superseded” officers who decide to choose the 3rd option and continue serving till they attain the age of superannuation.

YOUR “GIRLFRIEND” HAS “DUMPED” YOU

Let me explain metaphorically.

Suppose you have a steady girlfriend to whom you intend getting married and spending the rest of your life.

You have been loyal, sincere and devoted to your girlfriend.

Suppose she suddenly dumps you.

How will you feel…?

Won’t you feel betrayed…?

Similarly – won’t you feel “betrayed” the moment you are superseded for promotion…?

You have been loyal to the service – but – the service has not been loyal to you in return.

For no apparent reason – the service has “dumped” you.

You faithfully loved your girlfriend – and she dumped you.

You were totally devoted to the service – and the service “dumped” you.

Now – once your girlfriend has dumped you – what are the options open to you…?

Think about it.

You can become vindictive towards her – you can indulge in self-pity and sink into depression – you can plead with your girlfriend to take you back into her life – you can beg and beseech her to reconsider her decision to dump you – or – you can move on in life – and try to acquire a new girlfriend.

Similarly – what are your options when you are superseded…?

1. You can become “bitter” and resentful and start behaving in an acrimonious and spiteful manner. Such rancorous behavior will spoil inter-personal relationships and create “bad blood” in the environment – and – such negative vibes not only affect your own mental and physical health but will affect your family, friends and colleagues as well.

2. You can “internalize” your sorrow, start brooding and indulge in self-pity. Excessive self-commiseration will not only will make you miserable and cause you depression – but it may also push you towards alcoholism if you have a tendency to “drown” your sorrows in drink. I have seen many superseded officers becoming alcoholics.

(As an aside – let me tell you what one witty senior officer said about me when I was superseded.

He opined: 

“We don’t have to worry about him (me) becoming an alcoholic. The bugger is already a bloody drunkard. For all you know – supersession may have the opposite effect on him – and he may stop drinking…”

By the way – I did quit drinking – albeit a few years after supersession)

3. You can “plead” with the service to promote you. This can be done in a number of ways. You can “beg” your seniors for “thumping” ACRs to enable you to get promoted in the remaining attempts, you can take the “official” route – put up representations, statutory complaints and indulge in litigation etc. All this will fill you with anxiety and stress. And – if you get involved in litigation – besides the expenses involved – your mind will start thinking negative thoughts – especially as you keep discussing your case ad nauseam with lawyers and “sea lawyers”. Instead of thinking interesting creative positive thoughts – your mind will be constantly preoccupied with negative thinking. All this will affect your family and environment too.

4. Or – like in the “girlfriend dumping” metaphor – you can choose the option of moving on in life and acquiring a new “girlfriend”. Now – if you had chosen the option of resigning and quitting the service immediately after you are superseded – this new “girlfriend” can be a new job in “Civvy Street”. However – since you have decided to serve till superannuation – you will have to find this new “girlfriend” within the service. How do you do this…? How did I do this…? Read below…

INTROSPECTION

Firstly – you must be clear in your mind that the service has “rejected” you – and now – you are an “unwanted” entity (just like the example of your girlfriend “dumping” you and not wanting you anymore)

You have been brutally superseded – “passed over” for promotion – “written off” – “fallen by the wayside” – “deadwood” – discarded, redundant and unwanted by the environment.

You have been sidelined from the mainstream – you have been put on a sidetrack – and those on the main track don’t care two hoots about you.

So – don’t expect any “sympathy” from the system.

You are on your own – “index” – as they say in the Navy – and – you have to discover the best way to continue your journey in service as a “superseded” officer till you reach the age of superannuation.  

(If some seniors, course-mates and friends are helpful – consider it as a bonus – but don’t expect it)

By the time you are superseded – you would have done many appointments in a variety of jobs.

That’s the beauty of the Armed Forces (especially the Navy) – they make you work in a variety of jobs so that you become the “Jack of all Trades”.

Introspect – reflect – of all the jobs you did – which is the job you enjoyed the most…?

In my case – I had loved serving on ships the best.

But sadly – this job was ruled out – since – those days – superseded officers are not appointed for sea duties – which were considered mandatory “criteria” appointments for promotion.

Maybe – it was the view of the “powers-that-be” that since superseded officers were not eligible for selection for promotion – there was no point “wasting” a criteria appointment on “passed over” officers.

Also – remember – that the moment you are superseded for promotion – you are officially declared “incompetent”.

So – overnight – from being a professional “hot shot” officer – I became professionally “incompetent” – at least in the eyes of the system.

Hence – I became ineligible for “prestigious” high-profile appointments ashore.

Having ruled out these “high profile” options – I explored suitable “low profile” opportunities available to me.

I had done two tenures “instructional duties” – one at Navy Training “Stone Frigate” INS Valsura (where I had taught Naval Officers undergoing the Specialization Course) – and – one at the Institute of Armament Technology (IAT) where I had taught and guided the Advanced Post Graduate Master’s (ME) Course in Systems Engineering).

I had served in Research and Development (R&D) appointment.

I had served in a Naval Dockyard.

I had a stint as a “Babu in Uniform”.

Of the above options – I liked “instructional” appointments the best – especially IAT Pune – where the egalitarian “laissez faire” multi-service environment was conducive to superseded officers – much better than the “regimented” rank-conscious ethos at INS Valsura.

(Though “Quality Assurance” (QA) appointments were considered “suitable” for superseded officers – I hadn’t served in a “QA” billet – and so – I was quite averse to trying out something that was unknown).

As advised my “mentors” – I put up a request for an appointment in IAT – and – thanks to my well-wishers – six months later – I was appointed to IAT Pune on “Instructional Duties”.

(Coincidentally – IAT had asked for an Officer with Qualitative Requirements (QRs) which matched my qualifications/experience – my earlier tenure at IAT had helped a great deal).  

I must say that the Navy shows due consideration to “passed over” officers and tries to soften the blow of supersession by giving suitable appointments and long tenures to them.

Not only did Navy give me my choice appointment – but they gave me a long tenure too – more than 8 years – followed by 6 years at Mumbai.

(Prior to supersession – my average tenure in a station was less than 2 years).

Did I do justice to my appointment at IAT Pune…?

I would love to blow my own trumpet – but – I will just quote two extracts from two souvenirs (coffee table books) published by IAT during its Golden Jubilee.

Extract from page 63 of History of IAT – 50 Years of Excellence (1952 - 2002)

From Chapter on R&D Activities in Wings.

“Cdr VW Karve was the main pillar for many years and made the largest possible contributions to the students, faculty and institute. Numerous papers published by him in national and international journals earned a name for the Institute”

Extract from page 41 of IAT Golden Jubilee Souvenir

From the article “A Grateful Student Remembers”.

“Though not widely practiced, Cdr Karve’s Captain Haddockesque approach to education intrigued me enough to try out the concurrent methodology in conjunction with the sequential methodology, I was already into. It was an eventful and illuminating two semesters under the guidance of Cdr Karve, who was an Institute within the Institute”

CONCLUSION

Once you are “superseded” and “passed over” for promotion – if you choose to continue in service – it is best to make the most of it – by trying to identify and select a suitable “job” (within service parameters) – a job in harmony with your talent – a métier where you can flourish and contribute your best to the service too.

Self-Pity, Bitterness and Negative Thinking may prove counterproductive to your mental well-being and health – and – indulging in litigation may affect your “peace of mind”.

Remember the “dumped by girlfriend” metaphor – move on – be positive – introspect – discover your “métier” – find a new suitable “girlfriend” with whom you feel you can achieve your best – and – make the most of it. 

To be continued in Part 3 SUPERSEDED OFFICER’S SURVIVAL GUIDE 

VIKRAM KARVE 

Copyright © Vikram Karve 
Vikram Karve has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work. 
© vikram karve., all rights reserved. 

Disclaimer:
1. This story is a fictional spoof, satire, pure fiction, just for fun and humor, no offence is meant to anyone, so take it with a pinch of salt and have a laugh.
2. All stories in this blog are a work of fiction. Events, Places, Settings and Incidents narrated in the stories are a figment of my imagination. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

Copyright Notice:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.
Copyright © Vikram Karve (All Rights Reserved) 


© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Wednesday, July 31, 2019

Humor in Uniform : The More You Drink – The Higher You Go – and – The Higher You Go – The More You Need to Drink

Sometime ago – during one of my rare visits to a CSD Canteen – I saw a notice on the wall specifying the Monthly Liquor Quota for various ranks. 

This reminded me of a Spoof I had written many years ago titled: 

THE MORE YOU DRINK – THE “HIGHER” YOU GO

Dear Reader – Here is the Spoof once more for you to read and have a laugh... 

THE MORE YOU DRINK – THE “HIGHER” YOU GO 
(A Fictional Spoof by Vikram Karve)

A few days ago – a Military Veteran was engaged in a hot discussion with a Retired Civil Services Officer. 

The Military Veteran was complaining about the raw deal given to the Defence Services vis-a-vis Civil Services in matters of pay/allowances/perks/NFU/status etc by successive Pay Commissions. 

To counter this argument  the Retired Bureaucrat said: 

But  Defence Personnel get Subsidised Liquor – which is not given to Civil Services... 

I thought about it. 

The Civilian Bureaucrat was correct. 

The only exclusive perk that the Military gets is Liquor Quota (Liquor at Concessional Rates through CSD Canteens).

There are many various exclusive Civilian Perks like Non Functional Upgradation (NFU), Assured Career Progression (ACP), Higher Allowances, Faster Promotions, Guaranteed Career Progression, Retirement Age 60 years etc – which are not given to Defence Personnel.

On the other hand – amost all erstwhile Defence Perks like Canteen Stores Department (CSD) Canteen Facilities etc – all these Defence Perks have been extended to Civilians from time to time.

Recently  CSD Canteen facilities were given to Retired Defence Civilian Employees on par with Military Veterans. 

So  the only exclusive Military Perk that remains is Liquor Quota. 

However - only those Military Personnel who drink alcohol are able to derive benefit from the Liquor Quota. 

Those Military Personnel who do not drink alcohol (teetotallers) lose out on this exclusive military perk – since these Teetotallers in Uniform are not able to benefit from this Liquor Quota. 

Yes – sadly – all Military Teetotaller Non-Drinkers lose out on this exclusive perk of concessional liquor. 

Also  such teetotaller officers/soldiers who lose out on this Liquor Quota perk are not compensated in any way  and hence – they are totally deprived of this exclusive military perk of Liquor Quota...

Unlike various “in lieu compensatory allowances like HRA (House Rent Allowance in lieu of Govt Accommodation) MLR (Money in lieu of Ration) etc – sadly  there is no provision for MLL (Money in lieu of Liquor). 

Let’s hope that the powers-that-be introduce a new MLL (Money in lieu of Liquor) allowance for non-drinker teetotallers in military uniform to compensate them for the loss of being not able to derive benefit from the exclusive military perk of subsidised liquor. 

While drinkers can be given their existing authorised monthly Liquor Quota” – non-drinker teetotallers can be given MLL” (Money in lieu of their monthly Liquor Quota)

MLL will be very easy to compute: 

Monthly MLL Allowance = the monetary difference between civil market rate and military concessional rate for the full authorised Monthly Liquor Quota.  

Ha Ha  talking of Liquor Quota  I remembered this article I had written a few years ago... 

OROQ (One Rank One Quota)

I have a contrarian view about OROP.

I feel that the “One Rank One Pension” (OROP) concept is unfair  since it links Pension to Rank.

Thus  OROP will mainly benefit High Ranking Officers.

I feel that “length of service” should be given more importance than rank while computing pension. 

In fact – pension should be based on years of loyal service rendered to the nation.

Who deserves more pension:– 

A Colonel with 35 years of service – or a Brigadier with 25 years of service…?

After retirement – financial needs are the same for military veterans.

I therefore feel that it is logical, equitable and ethical to give pay and pension based on the years of active service rendered in the armed forces. 

However – I am a nonentity – so I have no choice but to accept this skewed concept of OROP.

If you agree with me that OROP is unjust to lower ranks – let me tell you that the concept of OROQ is even worse and more discriminatory.

The issue of OROP (One Rank One Pension) was raised only a few years ago. 

But – the concept of OROQ (One Rank One Quota) is existing since time immemorial.

(In the acronym OROQ   the “Quota refers to Liquor Quota)

Sometime ago 
 I saw a prominent notice outside the “Liquor Section” of a Military CSD Canteen.

You must be aware that as a “perk” – Defence Services (Armed Forces), Paramilitary, and maybe, some Central/State Police Personnel – all these “faujis” are entitled to liquor at concessional rates  and probably some “part-time faujis” like Reservists, Territorial Army, NCC Officers, Defence Civilians etc also enjoy this privilege of subsidised liquor at concessional rates.


Even teetotallers get a liquor quota – which either lapses and gets wasted – or is illegally siphoned off to non-entitled civilians.

It would be a good idea to give military non-drinkers Subsidized Milk or Fruit Juice in lieu of Liquor – till such time a proper MILL (Money in lieu of Liquor) allowance for non-drinker teetotallers is introduced in the Defence Services.

Coming back to the story 
 on the notice board  were listed the monthly “Liquor Quotas” for various military ranks, serving and retired. 

You don’t believe me...?

Have a look at the picture below showing Monthly Liquor Quota for various ranks in units (bottles) of Liquor (this may be outdated) 



Monthly CSD Liquor Quota


When I questioned this bizarre logic of OROQ (One Rank One Quota) – a Military Veteran explained that Senior Officers need to drink more alcohol to alleviate the stress due to work pressures at High Rank. 

The Logic of giving more liquor to Senior Officers was: 

The higher the rank – the higher the stress level – and hence – the more the quantity of alcohol required to alleviate the stress.

Fine. 

Maybe senior officers have to drink more alcohol since they are more stressed out than junior officers and soldiers. 

But why continue this discriminatory liquor quota policy after retirement...? 

Why have different Rank Based Liquor Quotas for Military Veterans after Retirement (and for widows/parents)...? 

Crazy logic  isnt it...? 

And  once you reach the top of the ladder  do you require to drink huge quantities of booze (unlimited liquor quota) – even after retirement...? 

If they say that “military intelligence is an oxymoron  then military logic is an even greater oxymoron...!!! LOL 

In the Defence Services – Rank Has its Privileges (RHIP) 

Yes  in the “military”  everything depends on rank – especially perks and privileges – even after retirement – so even the liquor quota was based on the RHIP Principle.

Yes – your liquor quota increases in direct proportion to your rank – the higher your rank – the more booze you get – even after retirement.

This was known to me – as I was well aware of the rank conscious “feudal” culture still prevalent in the Defence Services.

But as I read down the list – I was taken aback.

Apparently – even widows were entitled a “Liquor Quota”.

(I was not aware that Widows were entitled to a Liquor Quota – both my mother and my mother-in-law are Widows of Defence Officers – but I have never seen them drawing liquor from the CSD Canteen)

What surprised me was that even this widow’s liquor quota was as per the deceased husband’s rank – the higher the deceased husband’s rank – the more bottles of liquor his widow was entitled every month.

As per the “Widows
 Liquor Quota” shown in the picture above – widows of Generals were entitled 7 bottles a month – whereas 
– for widows of other officers it was 5 bottles a month – and – the quota was only 3 bottles of liquor for the rest. 

I was amazed at the absurdity of this liquor quota for widows.

Firstly – was there any logic in motivating widows to drink liquor...?

Secondly – do most widows really drink liquor...?

Thirdly – do widows of senior officers require to drink more liquor than other military widows...? 

I wonder how many widows actually draw their monthly liquor quota – and in the case of widows who regularly take their monthly liquor quota from the CSD Canteen – there are no prizes for guessing where the subsidized liquor is going.

I had seen RHIP rank discrimination for perks and privileges for military personnel and veterans  but to extend this RHIP concept to widows – and that too for “Widow’s Liquor Quota” – it seemed quite absurd to me – extending RHIP even after death of the fauji”.  

All these thoughts reminded me of a spoof I had written more than 7 years ago titled: 


THE MORE YOU DRINK THE HIGHER YOU GO

So let me delve into my HUMOR IN UNIFORM archives – and pull out this spoof – and post it once more under a new title BOOZE LOGIC : OLQ = ALCOHOL TOLERANCE LEVEL for you to read, enjoy and mull over.

Disclaimer:

This is a Humor in Uniform story – so – before you start reading the blog post – please read the “disclaimer” below. 
The article is a spoof  so read it only if you have a “sense of humor” – which seems to be scarce nowadays 
– especially among the uniformed fraternity. 

BOOZE LOGIC : 

OLQ = ALCOHOL TOLERANCE LEVEL 

DOES DRINKING ALCOHOL IMPROVE YOUR OLQ (Officer Like Qualities)...?

or conversely 


DO SUCCESSFUL PEOPLE NEED TO DRINK MORE ALCOHOL...? 


MUSINGS ON LIQUOR QUOTA 
A Fictional Spoof
By
VIKRAM KARVE


Disclaimer: 
1. Please read this blog post only if you have a “Sense of Humor”. This is a Spoof  simple lighthearted humor  just for a laugh. So please take it with a “pinch of salt” and have a hearty laugh.
2. Serious humorless mentally straitjacketed “Service-Minded OG Types are advised not to read this article.
3. This spoof is a work of fiction. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

RHIP (Rank Has Its Privileges) and OROQ (One Rank One Quota)

Here is one of my retirement musings on what I feel is an absurd interpretation and ludicrous implementation of the Rank Has Its Privileges or RHIP Concept. 

I am posting it once more for you to read, enjoy and ponder over. 

As I said, this is a spoof, for fun, so take it with a pinch of salt and have a laugh

Cheers ... !!

DOES DRINKING ALCOHOL IMPROVE YOUR “OFFICER LIKE QUALITIES” (OLQ)...?

Conventional wisdom says that as you grow older  you should reduce your consumption of alcohol. 

Yes – doctors say that you should drink less alcohol as you grow senior. 

However  the Military Canteen Stores Department (CSD) seems to think otherwise.

The more senior you become  the more booze you are supposed to drink.

Yes  your Liquor Quota increases according to your rank.

I am not aware of the exact liquor quota nowadays  but in our time  junior officers got about 12 bottles of booze a month  the mid-level officers got 14 bottles a month  and senior officers got 16 bottles a month  and flag officers (Admirals) got unlimited liquor. 

I understand that even after retirement  Generals, Admirals and Air Marshals enjoy unlimited liquor entitlement. 

Well  the number of booze bottles in the rank based liquor quotas may have changed  but the logic remains the same:

Your Liquor Quota increases in direct proportion to your Rank

Going by this Topsy-Turvy Logic one may draw the inference that: 

The more senior you become – the more liquor you are supposed to drink.

Conversely  as a corollary  one may surmise that: 

Promotion is directly proportional to your drinking capacity or alcohol tolerance level

The inference that can be drawn is that: 

Drinking Alcohol Enhances OLQ (Officer Like Qualities). 

In a nutshell  this liquor quota conundrum seems to be like a vicious cycle:

1. SUCCESSFUL PEOPLE NEED TO DRINK MORE ALCOHOL 

(on the premise that  high rank increases the appetite for alcohol)

2. TO BE SUCCESSFUL YOU MUST DRINK MORE ALCOHOL 

(on the premise that  Drinking Enhances OLQ or Officer Like Qualities)

Yes  the more the booze you can put down the hatch  and the more alcohol you can imbibe  the greater are your chances of promotion to higher ranks. 

Ostensibly  in the Army and Navy  Career Prospects are linked to Drinking Capacity. 

Your promotion depends on your drinking prowess.

It is simple: 

The more you drink  the higher you go 

THE MORE YOU DRINK – THE “HIGHER” YOU GO

DOES AN EXCEPTION PROVE THE RULE...?

Let me now digress a bit. 

There is a saying:

AN EXCEPTION PROVES THE RULE 

By the way  at least in my case  this “promotion is directly proportional to drinking capacity” theory did not hold true. 

For had this premise been foolproof 
 then “yours truly” would surely have become an Admiral  because in my heyday  I could comfortably polish off more than half a bottle of Rum in a drinking session. 

Yes  I had enormous capacity to hold my drinks – and I could easily drink most of the guys under the table.

Sadly 
 now  I am a teetotaller  but during my early Navy Days – I loved to drink  and I was a passionate drinker with great drinking capacity. 

If career prospects indeed depended on drinking capacity 
 I should have certainly gone high up the promotion ladder.

But 
– maybe  I was an exception to the rule. 

And  of course  there is a saying: an exception proves the rule

ALCOHOL TOLERANCE and PROMOTION POTENTIAL

Jokes apart  I feel that this absurd logic of a “pecking order” for liquor quotas is a rather bizarre interpretation of the RANK HAS ITS PRIVILEGES (aka RHIP) concept. 

In fact  it is a rather feudal approach. 

It extends the evil of rank based discrimination to absurd limits.

Can you please tell me:

By what logic does an elderly senior officer require to drink more alcohol than his much more younger and youthful junior...?

In fact  if you ask me  it may be more prudent to give more liquor quota to young carefree bachelor officers – and keep them in “high spirits” – rather than facilitate senior married officers to drown their sorrows in alcohol and damage their health  besides ruining their family life. 

This RHIP discrimination continues after retirement too.

This RHIP discrimination” happens – despite the fact that – once you retire from military service – you become a civilian – and you are considered equal in status with all others – irrespective of your service rank.

Of course – going by the logic of Rank Based Liquor Quotas – while you are in service  your Promotion Potential is directly linked to your Drinking Capacity (also called Alcohol Tolerance Level in medical parlance). 

If you are a good drinker – you will have two advantages in the military:

1. Your drinking prowess will enable you reach high rank while in service.

2. Once you hang up your boots  your high rank will ensure that you get a higher liquor quota even after retirement.

And now  someone tells me  even the paramilitary forces want to join the liquor quota bandwagon – and are applying the same bizarre RHIP Logic for determining liquor quotas – and want to continue the same rank-consciousness after retirement too.

Some uninitiated civilians must be wondering what is this “liquor quota” all about.

Well  maybe some veteran can correct me  but as far as I understand  this Liquor Quota concept seems to be “Relic of the British Raj”. 

MILITARY LIQUOR QUOTA  A RELIC OF THE BRITISH RAJ...?

The genesis of this liquor quota probably goes back to the days of the British Raj when a British Officer serving in India away from home was given a certain amount of liquor at concessional rates. 

After Independence  like most rules and regulations made by the erstwhile British rulers  this concept was continued. 

Yes  in many cases – we continue to follow archaic “Royal” traditions in our Defence and Civil Services  some obsolete customs and traditions which even the British have done away with long ago. 

One wonders whether the British Defence Forces still have a Liquor Quota for their Servicemen and Military Veteran Ex-servicemen...?

RUM BUM LASH NAVY  BLACK TOT DAY

As far as the Royal Navy is concerned  I read somewhere that – the British Royal Navy has discontinued the daily “Rum Rations” given to sailors on board ships. 

Rum Rations – called Grog in Naval Parlance – or a Tot of Rum  this was a centuries-old tradition from the days of the “Rum Bum Lash Navy 

(or Rum Sodomy Lash Navy – as Sir Winston Churchill is alleged to have famously quipped)

This day  31 July 1970  the last day when Rum Rations were served to sailors  was observed as Black Tot Day 

Whether this “perk” of subsidized liquor is good or bad – this is a debatable issue. 

But – subsidized liquor quota is certainly an incentive to drink alcohol.

I remember that subsidized liquor (or “Military Rum” in popular parlance) was considered a big perk in the erstwhile days of prohibition  when drinking was not quite prevalent in civilian society  and there was hardly any good quality Indian Liquor available.

But nowadays  post liberalization and globalization  the choicest quality of liquor is freely available all over  and  since most states levy various Taxes and VAT on CSD goods anyway  there is hardly any price differential between the CSD and Civil rates  so gradually  a day will come when this “liquor quota” may become irrelevant once GST is implemented for alcohol. 

MILITARY LIQUOR QUOTA – Yes RANK BIAS but NO GENDER BIAS

It is interesting to note

There is “Rank Bias” in the entitlement of CSD Liquor Quota  but – there is no “Gender Bias” as far as booze is concerned

In the Defence Services  Liquor Quota is a “Gender Neutral” perk.

Yes – as far as drinking alcohol is concerned  Lady Officers of the Army, Navy and Air Force have equal opportunity to imbibe the same amount of Liquor as their Male Counterparts in the same Rank. 

Women may have less alcohol tolerance levels as compared to men. 

Women Officers may enjoy various Gender Privileges like relaxed physical standards and soft non-combat appointments.

But  as far as Liquor Quota is concerned  women officers enjoy the same liquor quota entitlement as their male brother officers.

Liquor Quota is gender neutral”. 

In the matter of booze – your gender does not matter – it is only your rank that matters.

Cheers for 
gender equality

In fact – there is gender privilege in case a woman officer outranks her male colleague. 

A senior female officer will get more liquor quota than a junior male officer.

And – if a female officer gets married to a fellow male officer (marriage in uniform) – then with both husband and wife each getting their liquor quotas. 

So – for such military marriages in uniform – it is cheers all the way. 

This is an incentive for “booze loving military officers to marry fellow military officers and get double the liquor quota. 

Yes – if you are a military officer – and you marry a fellow military officer – you will have a cheerful marriage – full of cheers”...!!!

That calls for a drink...!!! 

DOES DRINKING ALCOHOL IMPROVE YOUR OLQ (Officer Like Qualities)...?

But coming back to the moot point  I still have two sets of unanswered questions in my mind:

1. Are you supposed to drink more alcohol as you get senior...? 

Is there a correlation between Rank and the amount of alcohol you need to imbibe...? 

Do successful people need to drink more alcohol...?

Do senior officers really need to drink more than their juniors...? 

Does drinking capacity increase with rank...? 

2. Is drinking capacity the key to career success...? 

Is promotion to senior ranks dependent on your drinking prowess...? 

Do you need to drink more alcohol to be successful...? 

Is there truth in the premise:

The More You Drink – The Higher You Go... 

Ha Ha  I know that you become “high” when you drink – but this “high” refers to spirits (high spirits whereas in the context Military Liquor Quota – the “high” refers to rank.

Do you go Higher in your Military Career if you drink more Alcohol...?

It is a vicious circle: 

The More You Drink – The Higher You Go – and – The Higher You Go – The More You Need to Drink

Hence: 

Alcohol and OLQ are inextricably intertwined

For a Defence Services Officer – everything depends on your OLQ (Officer Like Qualities).

So  to put everything we have discussed in a nutshell – the Moot Question is

Does drinking alcohol improve your OLQ...?

Will some “veteran” be so good as to enlighten us by answering this question.

Till then – “Cheers” – enjoy your “quota” – and have a drink...!!! 

Dear Reader: 

OROP (One Rank One Pension) a recent phenomenon – but – OROQ (One Rank One Quota) has existed since time immemorial. 

VIKRAM KARVE
Copyright © Vikram Karve 
1. If you share this post, please give due credit to the author Vikram Karve
2. Please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Please DO NOT Cut/Copy/Paste this post
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Disclaimer:
1. This is a fictional spoof, satire, pure fiction, just for fun and humor, no offence is meant to anyone, so take it with a pinch of salt and have a laugh.
2. All Stories in this Blog are a work of fiction. Events, Places, Settings and Incidents narrated in the stories are a figment of my imagination. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

Copyright Notice:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.
Copyright © Vikram Karve (all rights reserved)
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.