Thursday, August 4, 2016

Humor in Uniform – Musings on Liquor Quota

A few days ago there was a TV debate on the recent 7th Central Pay Commission (7CPC).

A Military Veteran panelist complained that the 7CPC had done injustice to the Defence Services vis-a-vis the Civil Services who have much better career and pay prospects due to advantageous service-conditions/perks like Assured Career Progression (ACP), Non-Funtional Finacial Upgradation (NFU), Higher Allowances, Higher Retirement Age etc which have been denied to the Defence Services. 

To counter this argument  a Politician panelist said: 

But  Defence Personnel get Subsidised Liquor – which is not given to Civil Services... 

I thought about it. 

The Politician was correct. 

The only exclusive perk that the Military gets is Liquor Quota (Liquor at Concessional Rates through CSD Canteens).

Apart from various exclusive Civilian Perks like ACP, NFU, Higher Allowances, Faster Guaranteed Promotions, Retirement Age 60 years etc which are not given to Defence Personnel – amost all erstwhile Defence Perks like CSD Canteen etc have been extended to Civilians from time to time  now even CSD facilities are given to Civilian Employees even after retirement on par with Military Veterans. 

So  the only exclusive Military Perk that remains is Liquor Quota. 

However - only those Military Personnel who drink alcohol are able to derive benefit from the Liquor Quota. 

Those Military Personnel who do not drink alcohol (teetotallers) are not able to benefit from this Liquor Quota – and all military non-drinkers lose out on this exclusive perk.

Also such teetotaller officers/soldiers who lose out on this Liquor Quota perk are not compensated in any way  and hence – they are totally deprived of this exclusive military perk of Liquor Quota...

Unlike various “in lieu compensatory allowances like HRA (House Rent Allowance in lieu of Govt Accommodation) MILR (Money in lieu of Ration) etc – sadly  there is no provision for MILL (Money in lieu of Liquor)

Let’s hope that the powers-that-be introduce a new MILL (Money in lieu of Liquor) allowance for non-drinker teetotallers in military uniform to compensate them for the loss of being not able to derive benefit from the exclusive military perk of subsidised liquor. 

While drinkers can be given their existing authorised monthly Liquor Quota” – non-drinker teetotallers can be given MILL(Money in lieu of their monthly Liquor Quota)

MILL will be very easy to compute: 

Monthly MILL Allowance = the monetary difference between civil market rate and military concessional rate for the full Monthly Liquor Quota.  

Ha Ha - talking of Liquor Quota  I remembered this article I had written a few years ago... 

OROQ (One Rank One Quota)

I have a contrarian view about OROP.

I feel that the “One Rank One Pension” (OROP) concept is unfair  since it links Pension to Rank.

Thus  OROP will mainly benefit High Ranking Officers.

I feel that “length of service” should be given more importance than rank while computing pension. 

In fact – pension should be based on years of loyal service rendered to the nation.

Who deserves more pension:– 

A Colonel with 35 years of service – or a Brigadier with 25 years of service…?

After retirement – financial needs are the same for military veterans.

I therefore feel that it is logical, equitable and ethical to give pay and pension based on the years of active service rendered in the armed forces. 

However – I am a nonentity – so I have no choice but to accept this skewed concept of OROP.

If you agree with me that OROP is unjust to lower ranks – let me tell you that the concept of OROQ is even worse and more discriminatory.

The issue of OROP (One Rank One Pension) was raised only recently – but – the concept of OROQ (One Rank One Quota) is existing since time immemorial.

(In the acronym OROQ   the “Quota refers to Booze or Liquor Quota)

Sometime ago 
 I saw a prominent notice outside the “Liquor Section” of a Military CSD Canteen.

You must be aware that as a “perk” – Defence Services (Armed Forces), Paramilitary, and maybe, some Central/State Police Personnel – all these “faujis” are entitled to liquor at concessional rates  and probably some “part-time faujis” like Reservists, Territorial Army, NCC Officers, Defence Civilians etc also enjoy this privilege of subsidised liquor at concessional rates.

Even teetotallers get a liquor quota – which either lapses and gets wasted – or is illegally siphoned off to non-entitled civilians.

It would be a good idea to give military non-drinkers Subsidized Milk or Fruit Juice in lieu of Liquor – till such time a proper MILL (Money in lieu of Liquor) allowance for non-drinker teetotallers is introduced in the Defence Services.

Coming back to the story 
 on the notice board  were listed the monthly “Liquor Quotas” for various military ranks, serving and retired. 

You don’t believe me...?

Have a look at the picture below showing monthly liquor quota for various ranks in units (bottles) of liquor. 

Monthly CSD Liquor Quota

When I questioned this bizarre logic of OROQ – someone explained that senior officers need to drink more alcohol to alleviate the stress due to work pressures at high rank (the higher the rank – the higher the stress level – and – the more the quantity of alcohol required to alleviate the stress).


But what about after retirement...?

Why have different Rank Based Liquor Quotas for Military Veterans after Retirement (and for widows/parents)...? 

Crazy logic  isnt it...? 

And  once you reach the top of the ladder  do you require to drink huge quantities of booze (unlimited liquor quota) – even after retirement...? 

If they say that “military intelligence is an oxymoron  then military logic is an even greater oxymoron...!!! LOL 

In the Defence Services – Rank Has its Privileges (RHIP) – yes  in the “military”  everything depends on rank – especially perks and privileges – even after retirement – so even the liquor quota was based on the RHIP Principle – yes – your liquor quota increases in direct proportion to your rank – the higher your rank – the more booze you get – even after retirement.

This was known to me – as I was well aware of the rank conscious “feudal” culture still prevalent in the Defence Services.

But as I read down the list – I was taken aback.

Apparently – even widows were entitled a “Liquor Quota”.

(I was not aware that widows were entitled a liquor quota – both my mother and my mother-in-law are widows of defence officers – but I have never seen them drawing liquor from the CSD Canteen)

What surprised me was that even this widow’s liquor quota was as per the deceased husband’s rank – the higher the deceased husband’s rank – the more bottles of liquor his widow was entitled every month.

As per the “Widows
 Liquor Quota” shown in the picture above – widows of Generals were entitled 7 bottles a month – for widows of other officers it was 5 bottles a month – and was 3 bottles of liquor for the rest. 

I was amazed at the absurdity of this liquor quota for widows.

Firstly – was there any logic in incentivizing widows to drink liquor?

Secondly – do most widows really drink liquor?

Thirdly – do widows of senior officers require to drink more liquor than other military widows? 

I wonder how many widows actually draw their monthly liquor quota – and in case of widows who regularly take their monthly liquor quota from the CSD Canteen – there are no prizes for guessing where the subsidized liquor is going.

I had seen RHIP rank discrimination for perks and privileges for military personnel and veterans  but to extend this RHIP concept to widows – and that too for “Widow’s Liquor Quota” – it seemed quite absurd to me – extending RHIP even after death of the fauji”.  

All these thoughts reminded me of a spoof I had written more than 3 years ago titled THE MORE YOU DRINK THE HIGHER YOU GO

So let me delve into my HUMOR IN UNIFORM archives – and pull out this spoof – and post it once more under a new title BOOZE LOGIC : OLQ = ALCOHOL TOLERANCE LEVEL for you to read, enjoy and mull over.

But before you start reading the article – please read the “disclaimer” – and proceed further only if you have a “sense of humor” – which seems to be scarce nowadays.



or conversely 



1. Please read this blog post only if you have a “Sense of Humor”. This is a Spoof  simple lighthearted humor  just for a laugh. So please take it with a “pinch of salt” and have a hearty laugh.
2. Serious humorless mentally straitjacketed “Service-Minded OG Types are advised not to read this article.
3. This spoof is a work of fiction. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.


Here is one of my retirement musings on what I feel is an absurd interpretation and ludicrous implementation of the Rank Has Its Privileges or RHIP Concept. 

I am posting it once more for you to read, enjoy and ponder over. 

As I said, this is a spoof, for fun, so take it with a pinch of salt and have a laugh

Cheers ... !!!


Conventional wisdom says that as you grow older you should reduce your consumption of alcohol and drink less liquor.

However  the Military Canteen Stores Department (CSD) seems to think otherwise.

The more senior you become  the more booze you are supposed to drink.

Yes  your liquor quota increases according to your rank.

I am not aware of the exact liquor quota nowadays, but in our time, junior officers got about 12 bottles of booze a month, the mid-level officers got 14 bottles a month, and senior officers got 16 bottles a month, and flag officers (Admirals) got unlimited liquor. 

I understand that even after retirement  Generals, Admirals and Air Marshals enjoy unlimited liquor entitlement. 

Well  the number of booze bottles in the rank based liquor quotas may have changed  but the logic remains the same:

Your Liquor Quota increases in direct proportion to your Rank

Going by this Topsy-Turvy Logic one may draw the inference that the more senior you become the more liquor you are supposed to drink.

Conversely  as a corollary  one may surmise that  promotion is directly proportional to your drinking capacity or alcohol tolerance level

The inference that can be drawn is that Drinking Alcohol Enhances OLQ (Officer Like Qualities). 

In a nutshell, this liquor quota conundrum seems to be like a vicious cycle:


(on the premise that high rank increases the appetite for alcohol)


(on the premise that Drinking Enhances OLQ or Officer Like Qualities)

Yes  the more the booze you can put down the hatch  and the more alcohol you can imbibe  the greater are your chances of promotion to higher ranks. 

Ostensibly  in the Army and Navy  Career Prospects are linked to Drinking Capacity. 

Your promotion depends on your drinking prowess.

It is simple: The more you drink  the higher you go


Let me now digress a bit:


By the way  at least in my case  this “promotion is directly proportional to drinking capacity” theory did not hold true. 

For had this premise been foolproof 
 then “yours truly” would surely have become an Admiral  because in my heyday  I could comfortably polish off more than half a bottle of Rum in a drinking session  yes  I had enormous capacity to hold my drinks – and I could easily drink most of the guys under the table.

 now I am a teetotaller  but during my early Navy Days I loved to drink  and I was a passionate drinker with great drinking capacity. 

If career prospects indeed depended on drinking capacity 
 I should have certainly gone high up the promotion ladder.

– maybe  I was an exception to the rule. 

And  of course  there is a saying: “ an exception proves the rule 


Jokes apart  I feel that this absurd logic of a “pecking order” for liquor quotas is a rather bizarre interpretation of the RANK HAS ITS PRIVILEGES (RHIP) concept. 

In fact  it is a rather feudal approach. 

It extends the evil of rank based discrimination to absurd limits.

Can you please tell me:

By what logic does an elderly ageing senior officer require to drink more alcohol than his much more younger and youthful junior...?

In fact  if you ask me  it may be more prudent to give more liquor quota to young carefree bachelor officers – and keep them in “high spirits” – rather than facilitate senior married officers to drown their sorrows in alcohol and damage their health  besides ruining their family life. 

This RHIP discrimination continues after retirement too.

This happens despite the fact that once you retire you relinquish your active service rank and become a civilian and are considered equal in status with all others.

So while you are in service, your Promotion Potential is directly linked to your Drinking Capacity (also called Alcohol Tolerance Level in medical parlance). 

If you are a good drinker you will have two advantages in the military:

1. Your drinking prowess will enable you reach high rank while in service.

2. Once you hang up your boots  it will ensure that in view of your high rank you will get a higher liquor quota even after retirement.

And now  someone tells me  even the paramilitary forces want to join the liquor quota bandwagon – and are applying the same bizarre RHIP Logic for determining liquor quotas and want to continue the same rank-consciousness after retirement too.

Some uninitiated civilians must be wondering what is this “liquor quota” all about?

Well  maybe some veteran can correct me  but as far as I understand  this Liquor Quota concept seems to be “Relic of the British Raj”. 


The genesis of this liquor quota probably goes back to the days of the British Raj when a British Officer serving in India away from home was given a certain amount of liquor at concessional rates. 

After Independence, like most rules and regulations made by the erstwhile British rulers, this concept was continued. 

Yes  in many cases we continue to follow archaic “Royal” traditions in our services, some obsolete customs and traditions which even the British have done away with long ago. 

One wonders whether the British Military still have a Liquor Quota for their Servicemen and Military Veteran Ex-servicemen. 


As far as the Royal Navy is concerned, I read somewhere that British Royal Navy has discontinued the daily “Rum Rations” given to sailors on board ships which was a centuries-old tradition from the days of the “Rum Bum Lash Navy” 

(or “Rum Sodomy Lash Navy” as Sir Winston Churchill is alleged to have famously quipped)

This day  31 July 1970  the last day when Rum Rations were served to sailors  was observed as Black Tot Day”.

Whether this “perk” of subsidized liquor is good or bad – this is a debatable issue. 

But – subsidized liquor quota is certainly an incentive to drink alcohol.

I remember that subsidized liquor (or “military rum” in popular parlance) was considered a big perk in the erstwhile days of prohibition  when drinking was not quite prevalent in civilian society  and there was hardly any good quality Indian Liquor available.

But nowadays  post liberalization and globalization  the choicest quality of liquor is freely available all over  and  since most states levy various Taxes and VAT on CSD goods anyway  there is hardly any price differential between the CSD and Civil rates  so gradually  a day will come when this “liquor quota” may become irrelevant once GST is implemented.


It is interesting to note that whereas there is “Rank Bias” in the entitlement of CSD Liquor Quota  there is no “Gender Bias” as far as booze is concerned. 

In the Defence Services  the Liquor Quota is a “Gender Neutral” perk.

Yes – as far as drinking alcohol is concerned  Lady Officers of the Army, Navy and Air Force have equal opportunity to imbibe the same amount of Liquor as their Male Counterparts in the same Rank. 

Women may have less alcohol tolerance levels as compared to men. 

Women Officers may enjoy various Gender Privileges like relaxed physical standards and soft non-combat appointments.

But  as far as Liquor Quota is concerned  women officers enjoy the same liquor quota entitlement as their male brother officers.

Liquor Quota is gender neutral”. 

In the matter of booze – your gender does not matter – it is only your rank that matters.

Cheers for gender equality. 

In fact – there is gender privilege in case a woman officer outranks her male colleague. 

A senior female officer will get more liquor quota than a junior male officer.

And – if a female officer gets married to a fellow male officer (marriage in uniform) – then with both getting liquor quotas – it is cheers all the way – yes – a marriage full of cheers”!

That calls for a drink!


But coming back to the moot point, I still have two sets of unanswered questions in my mind:

1. Are you supposed to drink more alcohol as you get senior...? 

Is there a correlation between Rank and the amount of alcohol you need to imbibe? 

Do successful people need to drink more alcohol...?

Do senior officers need to drink more than their juniors ?

2. Is drinking capacity the key to career success...? 

Is promotion to senior ranks dependent on your drinking prowess...? 

Do you need to drink more alcohol to be successful? 

Is there truth in the premise:

The More You Drink The Higher You Go 

Well  I know that you become “high” when you drink – but the “high” refers to spirits  not rank.

Do you go higher in your military career if you drink more...?

For a Defence Services Officer – everything depends on your OLQ (Officer Like Qualities).

So  to put everything we have discussed in a nutshell – the Moot Question is

Does drinking alcohol improve your OLQ...?

Will some “veteran” be so good as to enlighten us by answering this question.

Till then – “Cheers” – enjoy your “quota” – and have a drink ... !!! 

Also – do let us know what you think of MILL (Money in lieu of Liquor) for non-drinker teetotallers in uniform...?

Copyright © Vikram Karve 
1. If you share this post, please give due credit to the author Vikram Karve
2. Please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Please DO NOT Cut/Copy/Paste this post
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

1. This is a spoof, satire, pure fiction, just for fun and humor, no offence is meant to anyone, so take it with a pinch of salt and have a laugh.
2. All Stories in this Blog are a work of fiction. Events, Places, Settings and Incidents narrated in the stories are a figment of my imagination. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

Copyright Notice:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.
Copyright © Vikram Karve (all rights reserved)
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

This is a Revised Version of my article THE MORE YOU DRINK THE HIGHER YOU GO written by me Vikram Karve 4 years ago in the year in August 2012 and posted online in my various blogs including at   in my Academic and Creative Writing Journal at urls  and  and  and and etc 

No comments: