Wednesday, March 5, 2014

WHY DON’T WOMEN UNDERSTAND THE POWER OF 49 - Why do women vote for someone who causes them more harm than good?

WHY DON’T WOMEN UNDERSTAND THE POWER OF 49 ?

Why do women vote for someone who causes them more harm than good?


ELECTION DAY IN GIRINAGAR
An Apocryphal Story
By
VIKRAM KARVE

The Election Schedule has been announced. 

As I watched the news on TV, this story about elections came to my mind. Let me share it with you, once more:

ELECTION DAY IN GIRINAGAR – An Apocryphal Story By Vikram Karve

This happened a few years ago when I lived at a place called Girinagar near Pune.

“I want the day off,” Sushila, our maid, asked my wife.

“Why?” my wife asked.

“We have to vote. Today is election day,” she said.

“That’s good,” I said.

I was quite surprised at Sushila’s eagerness to vote because Sushila was totally illiterate.

Yes, she lived just a few kilometres away from a modern city like Pune (often called the “Oxford of the East”) – yet, like so many others, she could not read or write.

But her keenness to vote indicated what a vibrant democracy we were.

“Who are you going to vote for?” I asked, in jest.

She told me a symbol – “I am going to vote for XXX symbol,” Sushila said.

“But why?” I asked.

“WE have decided,” she said.

“WE” meant her husband.

Apparently, her husband had gone for a “meeting” and it was decided that the entire neighbourhood will vote for XXX symbol.

“So you vote for XXX symbol every time,” I asked her.

“No, last time we all voted for YYY symbol,” she said.

“Why?” I asked.

“Because “WE” had decided,” she said.

Of course, she did not know anything about the ideology of the  political parties to which the symbols XXX and YYY belonged.

It was none of her business.

Before every election, it was the men who had a meeting and decided who to vote for and the women dutifully complied.

(Of course, the men had a “leader” who guided them in these matters)

Like Sushila’s husband, most of the men in that area were drunkards who lived off their wives’ earnings.

But all that did not matter.

In the patriarchal society that prevailed, the women dutifully obeyed their men, even if the men were good-for-nothing drunkards.

So, in Sushila’s family of 7 voters (she, her husband, her two sons and daughters-in-law, and unmarried daughter), all would be voting for the symbol XXX which had been “decided”.

Added up, it was quite a large number of votes in the locality, and since they all of them voted en-bloc for a certain “symbol” it was quite a sizeable “votebank”.

A few more such solid votebanks could ensure victory in the election, as the victory of the XXX candidate proved.

Around 3 in the afternoon we saw Sushila standing near our gate.

“Have you voted?” I asked her.

“No,” she said.

“Voting time will be over soon. Why didn’t you vote in the morning?” I said.

“They haven’t come to take us,” she said.

A friend of mine who had come over and was hearing the conversation said, “Don’t you know? Someone has to come and take them to the polling booth in a vehicle – and then give them some inducement, here it is mostly liquor – only after that will they vote.”

After some time I saw a van arrive to take all them for voting.

In the evening we saw Sushila’s husband and her sons lurching in a drunken manner on the road, as were most men.

It was obvious that liquor was flowing freely on election day (though strictly speaking it was a “dry day”)

At night, when Sushila came to work, we saw tears in her eyes.

She said that her husband and her sons were drunk after enjoying all the booze they had got on election day.

Her husband had thrashed her as he always did when he was drunk, and one of her sons had thrashed his wife too.

“See,” my wife said to Sushila, “you voted for the person who gave liquor to your husband and sons”.

“Yes,” Sushila said sheepishly, “but we all women did that.”

“Why do all you women voted for those who are causing you harm?” my wife asked.

“We have to vote for whatever is decided.”

“Whatever is decided by the men?” I asked Sushila.

“Yes. Whatever is decided by the men,” Sushila said.

“So you will vote for whoever your husband tells you to, even that means getting brutally thrashed by your husband after he gets drunk on the liquor given to him by the very person you voted for? So you vote for the person who indirectly gets you trashed?”

“Yes. It is like that only. It was always like that and will always be like that,” Sushila said matter-of-factly.

What an irony!

Why do women vote for someone who causes them more harm than good?

Will things change in the forthcoming election? 

Will women “empower” themselves by voting for a candidate of their own choice? 

Or will women continue to follow the diktats of their men?

In India, women make up 49% of the electoral base.

The only way women can help themselves is by “empowering” themselves by voting for a candidate of their own choice who will do good for women.

Till that happens, nothing much is going to change, at least as far as women’s issues are concerned.

I ask again:

Why don’t women understand the power of 49 ?

Why do women vote for someone who causes them more harm than good ?

VIKRAM KARVE
Copyright © Vikram Karve 
Vikram Karve has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work. 
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Disclaimer:
All stories in this blog are a work of fiction. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
Copyright Notice:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.
Copyright © Vikram Karve (All Rights Reserved)

© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Sunday, March 2, 2014

IS NAVY LOSING THE MEDIA BATTLE?

IS NAVY LOSING THE MEDIA BATTLE?
Ramblings of a Retired Mind
By
VIKRAM KARVE

There are many sides to a story.

For example, take the recent navy submarine mishap, preceded by a number of accidents/incidents in the navy during the trauma-filled recent past, which culminated in the resignation of the navy chief Admiral DK Joshi on moral grounds.

There are many versions of the submarine mishap story, mostly speculative, doing the rounds of the mainstream media (Print and TV), on the social media (Twitter and Facebook) and on the internet.

But the most important version of the story is missing.

The navy version – the credible version – is not available anywhere.

The main protagonist, the navy, is not interacting with the media, print, electronic or social, and the navy is not telling its side of the story.

All sorts of news reports and conjectures are being bandied about in the media and there is no response from the navy. 

There was a similar situation during the so-called Wife Swapping Scandals in the Navy last year when Navy Public Relations (PR) remained conspicuous by its silence resulting in people believing whatever scuttlebutt was projected by the media.

This “Media Shyness” is not helping the navy’s image.

It is baffling as to why Navy Public Relations Officer (PRO) is reluctant to appear before the media to tell the navy’s side of the story, discuss the navy’s point of view and present the true facts pertaining to the mishap before the public.

Due to the woeful lack of navy public relations effort, people are hearing various speculative and opinionated versions of the story.

In the absence of a credible version from the navy, people have no choice but to start believing the scuttlebutt that is presented to them.

Total silence on the part of the navy is creating a widening information gap.

Such information gaps create a scope for confusion, speculation, rumours and wild “kite flying” by all and sundry which can damage the reputation of the navy.

During this entire hullabaloo, the Navy Public Relations (PR) remains conspicuous by its silence.

Since the Navy does not tell its side of the story, in the absence of authentic information, people start believing whatever is reported in the media which is mostly hearsay, gossip, unfounded information and unconfirmed reports.

Most of the media reports are quite unfavorable to the navy and this is adversely affecting the image of the navy.

Perception matters.

It is high time that Navy PR stops running away from the media and takes positive steps to restore the good reputation of the navy in the eyes of all stakeholders.

As far as the current mishaps are concerned, in order to repair the damage done to the good image of the navy by such controversies, there is an urgent need for Navy PROs to interact with the media, appear on TV and, if necessary, take part in debates and discussions and effectively communicate the authentic facts in a credible manner.

We see only retired officers and “expert commentators” appearing on TV debates giving their opinionated views based on half-baked information.

Many commentators seem highly biased and, at times, they tend to run down and vilify the navy.

But the Navy PRO is conspicuous by his absence and there is no one to rebut the fallacious and disparaging remarks made sometimes by various participants during TV discussions.

The saying “Silence is Golden” does not apply to Public Relations (PR).

In Public Relations – SILENCE IS NOT GOLDEN

The Navy must tell its side of the story truthfully and it must do this with promptness and accuracy.

Navy PR must engage with the media in order to ensure that the media reports such news in a balanced, fair, credible and transparent manner after hearing all sides of the story.

There is an urgent need for Navy PR to be more visible and articulate.

Navy Public Relations Officers (PRO) must appear on TV Channels promptly without delay the moment any news pertaining to the navy is reported and the PRO must give the Navy version of the incident.

This will help the truth to be established and obviate speculation, gossip, scuttlebutt and rumours.

There is a vital need for Navy PR to optimally utilize the Social Media, especially Twitter, which is highly effective in disseminating news almost instantaneously.

Navy PROs must make their presence actively felt on Twitter.

Alertness in monitoring news of interest and prompt response on Twitter is a highly effective public relations strategy.

This will help project the navy point of view effectively.

In today’s technology driven world, it does not pay dividends for an organization to be media-shy.

Being media-shy, and not telling the navy’s version of events, is damaging the reputation and image of the Navy, as people believe other versions which may be sensationalized, exaggerated, unflattering, misleading, or even untrue.

Today, the media is alert and quick to report any news.

There is a rat race in the media to be the first in reporting sensational “Breaking News”.

In addition to the print and electronic media, social media like Twitter and Facebook, owing to instantaneous speed and tremendous reach, has a huge power to affect your reputation in a split second with devastating effect.

In these modern circumstances, whenever there is negative, scandalous or sensational media coverage, orthodox PR strategies like “being in Denial Mode” or “burying your head in the sand like an ostrich” or “mouthing inane platitudes” may be counterproductive and may result in tarnishing reputation of the navy.

As I have said earlier, there is an imperative need for Navy PR to effectively engage the media and be speedy, visible and articulate.

The media has made rapid strides incorporating the latest in information technology, but Navy PR seems to be rooted in the distant past.

In fact, Navy PR seems to have become defunct.

Navy PR must ensure that, in addition to the PRO, senior naval officers are visible in the media and articulate the navy’s point of view.

We hope that the Navy PR rejuvenates itself to achieve Synergistic Public Relations.

Proactive Navy PR will help uphold the good image of the Navy.

Responsive Public Relations are imperative to enhance the image, morale, reputation and prestige of the Navy.

There is an urgent need to improve media management by the navy, and other defence services, army and air force too.

In conclusion, here is quote, maybe apocryphal, made by the late General K Sundarji, a distinguished former Army Chief, at a media seminar at Delhi:

“When commanders fail to respond to the media, the field is left open to the critics of the armed forces, then speculation and misleading stories abound”

VIKRAM KARVE
Copyright © Vikram Karve 
Vikram Karve has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work. 
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Disclaimer:
All stories in this blog are a work of fiction. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
NB:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.
Copyright © Vikram Karve (all rights reserved)

© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

MARRIED TO THE NAVY

HUMOR IN UNIFORM

“MARRIED” TO THE NAVY
An Apocryphal Story
By
VIKRAM KARVE

Disclaimer:
1. Please read this apocryphal story only if you have a sense of humor. This yarn is a spoof, pure fiction, just for fun and humor, no offence is meant to anyone, so take it with a pinch of salt and have a laugh.
2.  This story is a work of fiction. Events, Places, Settings and Incidents narrated in the story are a figment of my imagination. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

Copyright Notice:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.
Copyright © Vikram Karve (all rights reserved)


MARRIED TO THE NAVY

I once knew a very ambitious naval officer.

He was a total careerist and had no other interests.

His favourite line was: “I am married to the navy”.

He would have been happy to remain a bachelor all his life and focus all his attention totally on his naval career and achieve his sole aim of becoming an Admiral.

But his parents insisted that he get married so he agreed to see a girl.

He honestly told the girl about his career ambitions.

He clearly told her that his career would come first above everything else and emphatically quoted his favourite dialogue: “I am married to the navy”.

The girl liked this career-conscious officer mainly since he did not have any vices.

The “married to the navy” officer was a strict teetotaller and non-smoker.

 He did not touch alcohol or tobacco – a rarity in the navy those days.

Yes, as far as other major and minor vices were concerned too, he was quite unlike most other sailors - no wine, no women, no horses.  

She thought he would change after marriage.

She was sure he would “accommodate” her in his “marriage” with the navy even if he treated her as the “other woman”.

She was wrong.

This devoted sailor was strictly a “one woman man”.

And the only “woman” he was devoted to was the navy.

Yes, this officer was so loyally and devotedly “married to the navy” that he had no time for “other women” like his lawfully wedded human wife.

Fed up of being neglected, she (the “other woman”) walked out of the marriage so that her husband could devote himself to his “first wife” (Navy).

By the way, in contrast to the above story, I have seen some navy wives who actively help their naval husbands achieve success in their naval careers by willingly playing second fiddle and such ambitious naval wives are ready to go to any extent to promote the careers of their husbands.

Of course, there are those navy wives who seek other diversions to compensate for the neglect by their husbands who are “married to the navy”. 

I think this applies in all situations where individuals love their jobs more than they love their spouses, and due to their passion for their work they do not have the time or energy for conjugal duties towards their legally wedded human wives .


MY “WIFE”  AND MY “MISTRESS” 

Well, that was the Naval Yarn.

Now I am facing a similar predicament.

Till I was in the navy I had only one woman in my marriage and that was my lawfully wedded wife.

(Unlike the careerist naval officer, I was not desperately “married” to the navy).

But ever since I retired from the navy I have acquired a “mistress”. 

My “mistress” is my passion for writing and blogging.

Yes, ever since the writing bug bit me, and I became a writer and blogger, I am in a quandary.

Sometimes I feel the same way as the famous writer Anton Chekhov (a doctor by profession) who so aptly expressed his dilemma in a letter to a friend:

“Medicine is my lawful wife, and literature is my mistress. 

When I get fed up with one, I spend the night with the other. 

Though it is irregular, it is less boring this way, and besides, neither of them loses anything through my infidelity”.

In my case, since I have retired from the navy, my wife is my lawful wife and writing is my mistress.

Or is the other way round?

I really don’t know.

It is difficult to live a dual life.

I never had a mistress before so I really don’t know how to simultaneously handle a “wife” and a “mistress”.

Ever since I acquired this “mistress” of writing, my wife has started cribbing. 

She hates my “mistress”.

But now that I am bitten by the “writing bug” I love my “mistress” so passionately that I cannot get rid of her.

I don’t want to get rid of my much married wife too.

Maybe my wife may dump me as she hates my writing.

She may give me an ultimatum to get rid of my “writing mistress” saying that there can be only one “woman” in a marriage.

I love my wife and I love my “mistress” too.

Now I am soon going to start writing my ambitious novel so I will have to devote a lot of attention to my “mistress”.

How will my wife react?

It going to be a difficult life.

Will I be able to “handle” both my wife and my “mistress”?

Can they both co-exist?

Or will I have to get rid of one.

I don’t know what to do.

I seek your advice, especially if you are one of those lucky ones who have the dexterity to simultaneously handle a wife and a mistress.

Please tell me what to do.


DO YOU LOVE YOUR JOB MORE THAN YOU LOVE YOUR WIFE ?

I always tell my “married to the navy” friends that they must always have a “mistress” to fall back upon, because the navy is a very unreliable “wife” who can suddenly “dump” you when you least expect it.

The navy is a “wife” who expects you to be loyal unto death, but does not necessarily offer you the same loyalty in return.

We have seen so many “married to the navy” type officers being unceremoniously “dumped” – senior officers, Admirals, even Chiefs.

That is why, instead of being “married to the navy” is it not better to be married to your human wife?

And, is it not better to treat the navy like a “mistress” with whom you can enjoy for as long as you want and then say goodbye whenever you want to?

Is it not wise to treat your job as a “mistress” or “lover” with whom you can have a good time and breakup when either you are fed up of your job (or the job is fed up you)?

Is it not dangerous to be “married to the navy”?

There is a double risk:

1. Your human wife may get fed up of being neglected and dump you.

2. One day, the navy is sure to dump you too.

And then you will be left high and dry.

The moral of the story is simple:

Workaholics Beware.

Never get “married” to your job.

Treat your job like a “mistress” or “lover” – to enjoy, have a good time, and then dump or get dumped, and move on. 

VIKRAM KARVE
Copyright © Vikram Karve 
Vikram Karve has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work. 
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Disclaimer:
All stories in this blog are a work of fiction. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
NB:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.
Copyright © Vikram Karve (all rights reserved)

© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Did you like this article?
I am sure you will like the 27 short stories from my recently published anthology of Short Fiction COCKTAIL
To order your COCKTAIL please click any of the links below:
http://www.flipkart.com/cocktail-vikram-karve-short-stories-book-8191091844?affid=nme
http://www.indiaplaza.in/cocktail-vikram-karve/books/9788191091847.htm
http://www.apkpublishers.com/books/short-stories/cocktail-by-vikram-karve.html
COCKTAIL ebook
If you prefer reading ebooks on Kindle or your ebook reader, please order Cocktail E-book by clicking the links below:
AMAZON
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005MGERZ6
SMASHWORDS
http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/87925

Foodie Book:  Appetite for a Stroll
If your are a Foodie you will like my book of Food Adventures APPETITE FOR A STROLL. Do order a copy from FLIPKART:
http://www.flipkart.com/appetite-stroll-vikram-karve/8190690094-gw23f9mr2o

About Vikram Karve

A creative person with a zest for life, Vikram Karve is a retired Naval Officer turned full time writer and blogger. Educated at IIT Delhi, IIT (BHU) Varanasi, The Lawrence School Lovedale and Bishops School Pune, Vikram has published two books: COCKTAIL a collection of fiction short stories about relationships (2011) and APPETITE FOR A STROLL a book of Foodie Adventures (2008) and is currently working on his novel and a book of vignettes and an anthology of short fiction. An avid blogger, he has written a number of fiction short stories and creative non-fiction articles on a variety of topics including food, travel, philosophy, academics, technology, management, health, pet parenting, teaching stories and self help in magazines and published a large number of professional  and academic research papers in journals and edited in-house journals and magazines for many years, before the advent of blogging. Vikram has taught at a University as a Professor for 15 years and now teaches as a visiting faculty and devotes most of his time to creative writing and blogging. Vikram Karve lives in Pune India with his family and muse - his pet dog Sherry with whom he takes long walks thinking creative thoughts.

Vikram Karve Academic and Creative Writing Journal: http://karvediat.blogspot.com
Professional Profile Vikram Karve: http://www.linkedin.com/in/karve
Vikram Karve Facebook Page:  https://www.facebook.com/vikramkarve
Vikram Karve Creative Writing Blog: http://vikramkarve.sulekha.com/blog/posts.htm
Email: vikramkarve@hotmail.com
Twitter: @vikramwkarve
      
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Saturday, March 1, 2014

CAMARADERIE - Does it Exist in Today's Armed Forces?

IS CAMARADERIE THE REASON WHY THE APPOINTMENT OF THE NEW NAVY CHIEF BEING DELAYED?

Disclaimer:
1. This is a Wild Guess by a Retired Mind
2. The Story may be Apocryphal

A STORY OF CAMARADERIE

It was in 1978, I think, when we were having a drink on the lawns of RSI Pune (then located off East Street), that an old veteran retired army officer (of World War II vintage) told us this story, which may be apocryphal:

General Cariappa, the senior most Indian Officer, was expected to become the first Indian Army Chief in 1949.

General Rajendrasinhji was the next senior officer.

There were rumours that Rajendrasinhji would be made Army Chief as the government preferred him over Cariappa.

Rajendrasinhji is reported to have met Nehru and told him that he would resign if appointed Army Chief by superseding Cariappa.

He also reportedly said that no other General would take over as Army Chief if Carriappa was superseded and all of them would resign in protest.

Rajendrassinhji told Nehru that by superseding Cariappa he would set a wrong precedent and this may lead to politicising the Army.

Cariappa was appointed Army Chief.

After Cariappa completed his term, Rajendrasinhji succeeded him as Army Chief.

(By the way, RSI is the acronym for Rajendra Sinhji Institute, a Tri Service institution named after General RajendraSinhji)


IS THE APPOINTMENT OF THE NEW NAVY CHIEF BEING DELAYED FOR SIMILAR REASONS?

Is this the reason why the announcement of the New Navy Chief is being delayed?

Are all Admirals displaying a similar spirit of camaraderie?

Is no Admiral willing to take over as Navy Chief because they all want Admiral DK Joshi to be recalled back as Navy Chief?

Dear Reader: What do you feel – does the same spirit of camaraderie displayed by General Rajendrasinhji exist even today?