LOVE – DATING – ROMANCE – AFFAIRS – AND – STEALING AFFECTIONS – IN THE DEFENCE SERVICES (ARMY NAVY AIR FORCE)
IS THERE A FRATERNIZATION POLICY IN THE INDIAN ARMED FORCES...?
Ramblings of a Veteran
By
VIKRAM KARVE
IS THERE A NEED FOR A FRATERNIZATION POLICY IN INDIAN ARMED FORCES...?
“Stealing Affections” of Brother Officers’ Wives is an offence in the Armed Forces (Army, Navy and Air Force).
Yes – stealing the affection of a brother officer’s wife is deemed to be conduct unbecoming of an officer and conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline.
It is considered a grave offence which may even lead to dismissal from service.
However – stealing the affection of a “sister officer” is considered okay.
In fact – “brother officers” are permitted to marry “sister officers” – yes – male officers are allowed to marry female officers.
There are many “in-service couples” in the Armed Forces – and this trend of DIUC (Double Income Uniformed Couples) is increasing in the 3 Defence Services.
Someone even said that the Army Navy and Air Force encourage marriages between uniformed officers by providing various sops like spouse postings and dual accommodation seniority carry forward etc.
Does this not go against the tenets of “fraternization”...?
FRATERNIZATION
What is the meaning of the term “Fraternization” in the context of the Military Armed Forces...?
Any “unduly familiar relationship” between a senior and a junior is deemed to be Fraternization.
Hence – Marriage (which includes intimate sexual relationship) is an “unduly familiar relationship”.
Many other relationships like dating, living together and other intimate friendships can also be deemed to be “unduly familiar relationships”.
Suppose – in the Navy – a male Commander marries a female Lieutenant – or – in the Army – a male Lieutenant Colonel marries a female Captain – is it not a case of “fraternization”...?
Considering the considerable difference in ranks/seniority between husband and wife – is it not an “unduly familiar relationship” between a senior and a junior which can be deemed to be fraternization...?
It appears that – at least in the Indian Armed Forces – a lot of leniency is shown as far as relationships between male and female officers are concerned (despite their difference in rank).
This is evident if you observe the increasing number of marriages between male and female officers in the uniformed services.
Marriages and Relationships between officers is not considered fraternization in the Indian Armed Forces.
But – what will happen if a Female Officer wants to marry a Male Soldier, Sailor or Airman...?
It can happen – anyone can fall in love with anyone.
(At present – in the Indian Armed Forces – there are women only at Officer Level – but later – when women are inducted in all ranks – reverse gender situations can also occur – of women soldiers falling in love with male officers and wanting to marry them)
At present – Indian Armed Forces allow Male and Female Officers to marry each other irrespective of the inter-se seniority.
Will the Indian Armed Forces allow Officers to marry Soldiers, Sailors or Airmen...?
For example – will the Army allow a Lady Officer to marry a Male JCO?
Can Officers Marry, Date, Romance or have Relationships with PBOR (Personnel Below Officer Rank)...?
Will this be treated as Fraternization...?
DO THE INDIAN ARMED FORCES HAVE A FRATERNIZATION POLICY...?
Is there a statutory Fraternization Policy in the Indian Armed Forces...?
I do not know.
“Fraternization” is a uniquely military concept.
Military custom demands that seniors must maintain thoroughly professional relationships with juniors at all times.
“Fraternization” is the term traditionally used to identify personal relationships that contravene the customary bounds of acceptable senior-subordinate relationships.
“Fraternization” means any relationship in the military chain of command that is prejudicial to good order and discipline.
Fraternization Rules date back to the time of the Roman Army.
The purpose of such Fraternization Constraints is to:
1. Maintain good order and discipline.
2. Preserve military sanctity and ensure the integrity of the chain of command.
3. Prevent adverse impact upon a junior’s response to orders, the senior’s exercise of command, or the perception of others regarding the senior’s impartiality (In most cases of fraternization, perceptions matter more than reality).
4. Promote relationships of mutual respect and confidence between juniors and seniors.
FRATERNIZATION POLICY FOR INDIAN ARMED FORCES
I am sure you have seen Marriages between Serving Officers of the Armed Forces.
But – have you ever come across Marriage between an Officer and a PBOR (Personnel Below Officer Rank)...?
Do tell us if you have come across a marriage between a serving officer and a serving soldier.
Is there a need for a statutory Fraternization Policy to regulate “unduly familiar personal relationships” in the Armed Forces (Army Navy and Air Force)...?
Well – that is for the “powers-that-be” to decide.
With the entry of women in the armed forces in the 1990’s – have the archaic Army Act, Navy Act and Air Force Act been amended to include a Fraternization Policy...?
Yes – with the advent of women into the Army, Navy and Air Force – there has been a lot of pontification about “gender-sensitization” – but has a statutory fraternization policy been formulated and promulgated...?
MILITARY FRATERNIZATION POLICY TO REGULATE AND “UNDULY FAMILIAR RELATIONSHIPS” (LOVE DATING ROMANCE AFFAIRS MARRIAGE) IN THE ARMY NAVY AND AIR FORCE
FOUR CARDINAL FRATERNIZATION TENETS
As I said earlier – it is the prerogative of the “powers-that-be” to decide whether to have a fraternization policy or not (as per the culture prevalent in their respective services).
But – if there is to be a fraternization policy – then – perhaps – it can be formulated based on one of the following cardinal tenets:
1. Prohibit Marriages between Members of the Armed Forces (Army Navy Air Force)
Whether you are an Officer or a PBOR – you cannot marry anyone in uniform (you cannot have an unduly familiar relationship with any other serving officer, soldier, sailor, airman).
This means that the prevalent practice of “fauji” marriages between male and female officers will be banned.
Yes – “fauji” marriages will be treated as fraternization and will be prohibited – especially if there is a difference in rank/seniority between the two officers.
2. Prohibit Same-Service Marriages
For example – if you are in the Army you cannot Marry someone in the Army – though you may Marry someone from the Navy or Air Force – and vice versa.
3. Prohibit Same Branch/Arm/Service/Regiment/Corps Marriages
For example – a male Army Officer from EME cannot marry a female Officer from the EME – but he may marry a female Officer from ASC, AOC etc – a helicopter pilot cannot marry another helicopter pilot – but may marry a fighter pilot or an officer from non-flying branch – and – similar restrictions for officers belonging to the same branch in the Navy.
4. Prohibit Marriages between Officers and PBOR
Officers cannot Marry Soldiers/Sailors/Airmen.
NEED TO DEFINE WHAT CONSTITUTE “UNDULY FAMILIAR RELATIONSHIPS”
Of course – in addition to Marriage – the Fraternization Policy must define and govern “unduly familiar relationships” between uniformed personnel – like dating, romance, physical relationships, live-in relationships and intimate friendships – and fraternization principles must apply to regulate such relationships.
For example:
Should an Officer be allowed to indulge in dating or become romantically involved with another Officer of the Armed Forces...?
Should dating between Officers and PBOR (Soldiers/Sailors/Airmen) be permitted...?
Or – should Officers of the Armed Forces be allowed to “Date” only Civilians...?
Maybe – the same Four Cardinal Fraternization Tenets for Marriage (mentioned above) can apply to other relationships as well.
FRATERNIZATION POLICIES IN MILITARY FORCES
Most mixed-gender military forces have laid down fraternization policies in order to prevent inappropriate relationships which can be detrimental to morale and discipline.
There is a perception that “Fraternization” refers relationships between Officers and PBOR (soldiers, sailors, airmen).
This is not so.
Fraternization includes officer-officer relationships as well.
In a case a few years ago in the US Navy – Two Officers – a CO and XO of a Ship – both of the same rank (Lieutenant Commander) – were punished for violation of the US Navy Fraternization Policy:
“Fraternization” means any relationship in the military chain of command that is prejudicial to good order and discipline
FRATERNIZATION POLICIES TO REGULATE “UNDULY FAMILIAR RELATIONSHIPS” IN THE MILITARY
The Indian Defence Services (Army Navy and Air Force) are becoming more and more mixed-gender with increasing number of women joining the Armed Forces.
So – it may be desirable to formulate and promulgate a Statutory Fraternization Policy based on one of the four Cardinal Fraternization Principles as considered apt:
1. Prohibit Marriages and Relationships between members of the Armed Forces (Ban all “inter-service” and “intra-service” fraternization)
2. Prohibit Same-Service Marriages and Relationships (Ban “intra-service” fraternization but allow “inter-service” fraternization)
3. Prohibit Same Branch/Regiment/Corps Marriages and Relationships (Ban intra-branch/regiment/arm/service/corps fraternization)
4. Prohibit Marriages and Relationships between Officers and PBOR (Ban fraternization between officers and soldiers/sailors/airmen)
Which one of the four options do you prefer...?
VIKRAM KARVE
Copyright © Vikram Karve
1. If you share this post, please give due credit to the author Vikram Karve
2. Please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Please DO NOT Cut/Copy/Paste this post
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.
1. If you share this post, please give due credit to the author Vikram Karve
2. Please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Please DO NOT Cut/Copy/Paste this post
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.
Disclaimer:
1. This blog post is a spoof, satire, pure fiction, just for fun and humor, no offence is meant to anyone, so take it with a pinch of salt and have a laugh.
2. All stories in this blog are a work of fiction. Events, Places, Settings and Incidents narrated in the stories are a figment of my imagination. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
Copyright Notice:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.
Copyright © Vikram Karve (all rights reserved)
This is an updated version of my article FRATERNIZATION AND MILITARY LOVE earlier posted by me Vikram Karve online in my Academic and Creative Writing Journal Blog on November 5, 2013 at url: http://karvediat.blogspot.in/2013/11/fraternization-and-military-love.html
No comments:
Post a Comment