MILITARY LEADERSHIP
OFFICER LIKE QUALITIES (OLQ)
PHYSICAL FITNESS versus MENTAL ROBUSTNESS
Musings of a Veteran
By
VIKRAM KARVE
“ARTHRITIS” IN THE HEAD IS WORSE THAN ARTHRITIS IN THE KNEE
In his autobiography A SOLDIER’S STORY General Omar Nelson Bradley (the renowned American General who commanded the 12th Army, the largest army in World War II, during the invasion of Europe) recounts an incident.
During the war – one of the best Corps Commanders, General Troy H Middleton suffered an arthritic disability in the knee and it was suggested to General Marshall (the US Army Chief) that Middleton be sent home rather than be given command of a army corps in the field which was engaged in active combat.
General Marshall retorted:
“I would rather have a man with arthritis in the knee than one with arthritis in the head. Keep Middleton there.”
General Marshall was proved right.
In Europe, as a part of Patton’s 3rd Army, Middleton commanded VIII Corps with distinction and successfully led it throughout the European Invasion all the way from Normandy to the Elbe.
Middleton was a seasoned campaigner, having commanded 45th Infantry Division in the Sicilian Campaign in II Corps (commanded by Patton and later by Bradley).
He was then promoted to command VIII Corps in Patton’s Third Army during the invasion in Europe, when he was struck by an attack of Arthritis.
Marshall’s insistence that “I would rather have a man with arthritis in the knee than one with arthritis in the head” was proved right as Middleton performed brilliantly as a leader especially in the Battle of the Bulge (described below):
“Had not Middleton, egged-on by Patton, ordered unrelenting attacks against the assaulting Nazis – and – had not his infantrymen and tankers risen to highest levels of gallantry – the Germans certainly would have overcome the 101st’s resistance and been able to re-establish their supply lines leading to Bastogne”
Following this battle – Middleton led VIII Corps in its relentless push across Germany right into Czechoslovakia when Germany surrendered and the war ended.
Before the Battle of the Bulge, his leadership in Operation Cobra led to the capture of the important port city of Brest, France, and for his success he was awarded a second Distinguished Service Medal by General George Patton.
Middleton was recognized by both the Supreme Allied Commander Eisenhower and Army Commander Patton as being a corps commander of extraordinary abilities.
General Patton had recommended that if he became a battle casualty, then General Middleton should succeed him as commander of the 3rd Army.
Despite being “physically unfit” due to arthritis – General Middleton spent over 1200 days in war conditions in the field – ever since departing from America in January 1942.
Middleton logged 480 days in actual combat during World War II – more than any other American General Officer.
General Troy H Middleton achieved this remarkable and most spectacular military success despite have been stricken by arthritis in the knee.
(In India, he would have probably been declared a low medical category and he would have been invalided out of the army on medical grounds – so powerful are our army doctors – they can ruin career prospects of competent officers by the dreaded “weapon” of medical category)
This true story, of the arthritis afflicted General Middleton narrated above, exemplifies the importance of mental fitness for a military officer, especially in senior ranks.
Mental fitness is certainly as important as physical fitness, if not more.
In some cases, especially for senior officers, mental fitness is more important than physical fitness.
The importance of mental fitness over physical fitness is exemplified in the words of General Eisenhower (when it was repeatedly recommended to him by doctors that General Middleton should be sent back to America after his success in Africa and the Sicilian Campaign, as he was not physically fit for the forthcoming Invasion of Europe): “I don't give a damn about his knees; I want his head and his heart. And I’ll take him into battle on a stretcher if we have to.”
Will it not be apt for the Indian Armed Forces, obsessed with “medical categories”, to mull over these words on the importance of mental fitness in senior officers.
PHYSICAL FITNESS AND MENTAL FITNESS EVALUATION IN THE INDIAN ARMED FORCES
Do we regard mental fitness to be as important as physical fitness in our armed forces (army, navy and air force)?
In the beginning (at the time of recruitment): Yes (For Officers, both Physical and Mental Fitness are evaluated in the initial selection process).
In India, the selection process for an officer in the armed forces (army, navy and air force) includes assessment of both physical fitness and mental fitness.
Physical fitness is tested at the Services Selection Board (SSB) followed by a thorough medical examination at the Military Hospital (MH).
Mental fitness is analyzed by various psychological tests, group tasks and interviews at the SSB.
Thus, both physical and mental fitness are confirmed before selection.
Thereafter, physical fitness is evaluated and confirmed every year by an Annual Medical Examination (AME) and Physical Evaluation Test (PET).
If an officer does not meet the specified standards, the officer’s medical category is downgraded and his career is adversely affected as the officer is considered unfit for combat duties.
Physical fitness is not taken for granted.
This is because it is felt that physical fitness of a person can change over the years depending on one’s health and the attention one pays to maintaining oneself.
However, mental fitness is never evaluated during your entire military career once you have been commissioned as an officer.
Mental fitness is taken for granted.
It is assumed that mental fitness does not change and there is no need to “examine” and confirm an officer’s mental fitness every year.
However – like physical fitness can change with time – similarly – mental fitness can also change over the years depending on life experiences.
PHYSICAL TOUGHNESS versus MENTAL ROBUSTNESS
Physical toughness and mental robustness are two different attributes.
Physical toughness does not automatically guarantee mental robustness.
Yes, it may not always be true that all physically tough persons will necessarily be mentally robust as well.
In the army, physical toughness may be more important for junior officers, but for senior leadership it is mental robustness that matters.
In his book “The Unfought War of 1962” the author JR Saigal cites the example of his Brigade Commander who was physically tough but mentally weak-willed.
As a junior officer, he had suffered harrowing experiences as a prisoner of war during the Second World War and was determined not to become a prisoner again.
The Brigade Commander became so jittery when he heard of the advancing enemy that he abandoned his troops and fled from the battlefield even before the attack was launched by the enemy.
The author says that a person with such a vulnerable mental make-up should not have been posted anywhere near an operational area.
Yet such a shaky and mentally unfit officer was posted to a crucial command appointment – and that too in war.
DOES “ACR SYNDROME” CONVERT “LIONS IN ACTION” INTO “DOGS IN OBEDIENCE”...?
In the Navy too – I have seen many officers – who were mentally robust in their younger days – become mentally soft and lose their boldness as they become senior – due to their fervent ambition and fanatical obsession to get promoted to higher rank.
In their quest for promotion at any cost – these officers fall victim to the “ACR Syndrome” – since promotion is solely dependent on the all important ACR (Annual Confidential Report).
I once saw a Commanding Officer become a nervous wreck in his quest to earn an “outstanding” ACR – there were 10 other highly ambitious Commanding Officers in the Fleet of the same rank competing with him for promotion, and, he knew that the vacancies were very few, so the cut-throat competition was very tough.
I was astonished by the change in the mental makeup of this officer, since the same officer had been a robust happy-go-lucky carefree individual in his younger days.
It seemed that “zero error syndrome” coupled with his extreme ambition had made him fearful and lose his mental robustness.
Instead of enjoying his command, he was stressed out, since, due to his obsession for an “outstanding” ACR, he was doing a few things which he knew were wrong.
It is quite ironical, that instead of becoming more and more mentally forceful as they become senior, some highly ambitious officers start becoming spineless, due to their servility to the powers-that-be, as they crave for career-success and even yearn for post-retirement sops.
Thus, by the time they reach high rank, long years of submissiveness severely compromises their mental robustness and this may affect their command capability, especially in a crisis.
You cannot expect an officer to be a “dog in obedience” and “lion in action” at the same time.
Similarly, once an officer who was a “lion in action” gets slowly converted into a “dog in obedience” – it is very difficult to instantly re-convert the “dog in obedience” back into a “lion in action”.
ANNUAL MENTAL FITNESS ASSESSMENT
WHY NOT HAVE ANNUAL PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINATION (APE)
One solution to alleviate this problem is to have an Annual Psychological Examination (APE) to assess the current “Mental and Emotional Fitness” of an officer and ascertain his suitability for leadership in combat situations.
In today’s world, modern tools and techniques are available to conduct such psychological tests.
All that needs to be done is to include an Annual Psychological Examination (APE)along with the Annual Medical Examination (AME).
It is as simple as that.
The APE will ensure that the military will have officers at the top who are as mentally robust as they are physically tough.
And those with “arthritis in the head” will be weeded out.
VIKRAM KARVE
Copyright © Vikram Karve
1. If you share this post, please give due credit to the author Vikram Karve
2. Please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Please DO NOT Cut/Copy/Paste this post
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.
Disclaimer:
1. These are my personal views based on my observations and life experiences and the stories and examples quoted may be apocryphal.
2. All stories in this blog are a work of fiction. Events, Places, Settings and Incidents narrated in the story are a figment of my imagination. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
Copyright Notice:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.
Copyright © Vikram Karve (All Rights Reserved)
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.
