Who is Responsible for Corruption – Musings on International Anti-Corruption Day

Today – the 9th of December – is observed as International Anti-Corruption Day. 

On the occasion of International Anti-Corruption Day– here is an article I had written around 6 years ago – once more – for reflection...

CORRUPTION – WHO IS RESPONSIBLE…?

Musings on CORRUPTION and CULPABILITY

By

VIKRAM KARVE

Whenever there is a scam – it is quite amusing to see top leaders abdicate responsibility and blaming their juniors.

It seems to have become a standard leadership practice to dodge responsibility for scams, bribery and the corrupt activities – and pass the buck by blaming their juniors who are made scapegoats. 

However – from the ethical point of view – if there is a scam – the Top Man (Head of the Organization) cannot escape culpability – and he must be held accountable for corruption in the organization which he heads. 

When Corruption takes place – there can be 4 scenarios – as far as the Top Leadership – or “TOP MAN” – is concerned:

1. THE TOP MAN INITIATES THE CORRUPTION

The corruption/scam is done at the behest of the leader. 

The “Top Man” initiates the corruption.

(of course – the corruption may be implemented on ground by morally pliable juniors). 

Thus – in this case – it is the Top Man who is directing and presiding over the corruption – and the obsequious, subservient and “flexible” subordinates facilitating, helping and participating in carrying out the corruption – and also enjoying their share of the “pie” in the loot.

If you observe the various scams in the news these days – you will realize that most present day corruption falls in this category – it is the leader who initiates corruption.

2. THE TOP MAN IS INVOLVED IN THE CORRUPTION

A corruption “system” (systemic corruption) may already be in place in an organization – and the Top Man joins in and becomes a part of it. 

The “Top Man” starts participating in the corruption.

Here is an illustrative example:

“X” joined as the Boss of an inspection organization on deputation. 

He had not served in that organization before. 

At the end of the first month – “X” he found an envelope with money in his drawer. 

On inquiring, he was told that this was his “share” in the “hafta” or “mamool”. 

He took the envelope and put it in his briefcase. 

Thus – the “Top Man” became a part of the “system”.

3. THE TOP MAN TURNS A BLIND EYE TO THE CORRUPTION

The “Top Man” knows that there is corruption going on in his organization – but he turns a blind eye to the corruption.

He looks the other way – and he does nothing to stop the corrupt practices. 

He does not want to “rock the boat” or “ruffle feathers” – so he lets the corruption happen unhindered.

Whereas in first and second examples of corruption – the leader was guilty of “commission” – in this case – the Top Man is guilty of “omission”.   

4. THE TOP MAN IS CLUELESS ABOUT THE CORRUPTION

The “Top Man” is so incompetent that he does not know what is going on in his organization – he is ignorant and clueless about the corruption happening in his organization.

It is possible that he may be faking innocence – pretending to be clueless and feigning ignorance to wriggle out of the situation as we see in some recent cases.

Even if he is genuinely clueless about the corruption in his organization – then he is not fit to head the organization and he must be sacked on grounds of incompetence.

CONCLUSION

It is clear from the four cases elucidated above that the Leader or “Top Man” is fully responsible, accountable and culpable for corruption in his organization because:

It is the Top Man who “INITIATES the corruption” 

or 

The Top Man “is INVOLVED in the corruption” 

or 

The Top Man “turns a BLIND EYE to the corruption” 

or 

The Top Man “is CLUELESS about the corruption”

Yes – it is the “Top Man” in the Organization who does one or more of the following:

1. He initiates the corruption

2. He is involved in the corruption

3. He turns a Blind Eye to the corruption and he lets the corruption happen unhindered

4. He is Clueless about the corruption going on in his organization due to his incompetence and ineptitude?

Hence – it is the “Top Man” or Leader – who initiates – is involved in – turns a blind eye to – or – is clueless about corruption.

In all the four cases the Leader or “Top Man” must be held culpable for the corruption in his organization.

When a scam happens or corruption is prevalent in an organization – the Top Man cannot shirk responsibility and escape accountability.

Therefore – even if there is a whiff of a scam – or the slightest evidence of corruption in an organization – the “Top Man” must be held responsible, accountable and culpable – and he must resign – or be sacked immediately in order to envisage a fair and speedy investigation.

Before I end – let me tell you that in the Navy of yesteryear – the Captain or Commanding Officer was held responsible for anything and everything on his ship or shore establishment – and if anything went wrong – he was summarily sacked. 

However – even in the Navy and other Defence Services – things have changed now – with the Military Leadership taking the cue from political and civilian leadership in the Art of “Management” of Corruption.

There are some exceptions – like the erstwhile Navy Chief who resigned taking moral responsibility for accidents/mishaps – but in most cases – very few Senior Officers accept moral responsibility for corruption/wrongdoings happening under their command – they try to save their own skins and tend to pass the blame to their juniors.

So – the Military Top Brass is quick in taking the cue from Politicians and Bureaucrats.

In fact – it would be better of things were the other way around – and the political and civilian leadership imbibed values from the military – and this tradition of taking responsibility be followed by political leadership and civilian bureaucracy.

Whenever corruption or something wrong happens – the “Top Man” must be held accountable and punished – instead of passing on the blame to juniors.

If we wish to eradicate corruption in an organization (or in a country or state) – the only solution seems to be is to have a scrupulously honest leader – who is committed and decisive in eradicating corruption – and who is ruthless in punishing the corrupt. 

VIKRAM KARVE

Copyright © Vikram Karve 
1. If you share this post, please give due credit to the author Vikram Karve
2. Please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Please DO NOT Cut/Copy/Paste this post
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Disclaimer:

1. This article is a spoof, satire, pure fiction, just for fun and humor, no offence is meant to anyone, so take it with a pinch of salt and have a laugh.

2. All stories in this blog are a work of fiction. Events, Places, Settings and Incidents narrated in the stories are a figment of my imagination. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

Copyright Notice:

No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.

Copyright © Vikram Karve (All Rights Reserved)

     

© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

 

Humor in Uniform – “Northern” Naval Command

WHY IS INDIA SO “DELHI-CENTRIC”...? 

“NORTHERN” NAVAL COMMAND

A Spoof

By

VIKRAM KARVE

THE “DELHI-CENTRIC” NAVY – “NORTHERN NAVAL COMMAND”

Many years ago – in the 1970’s – when I was “greenhorn Subbie” in the Navy – we had a senior who possessed a delightful sense of humour.

He would keep us regaled with his amusing observations and witty comments – sometimes laced with delicious incisive barbs and sharp satiric wit.

This witty raconteur was a true “sea-dog” – and whenever he spoke everyone listened with rapt attention.

Once during our customary make-and-mend elbow bending beer session in the wardroom he asked us: “How many commands are there in the Navy?”

“There are 3 Naval Commands – Western, Eastern and Southern Naval Commands,” we all answered in unison – referring to the 3 Naval Commands – Western, Eastern and Southern Naval Commands – which were the sentinels of the Arabian Sea, Bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean respectively – the waters around the three seaboards surrounding the Indian peninsula.

“You are wrong – there are 4 Commands in the Navy,” the “sea-dog” said, “you have forgotten the most important Naval Command – the ‘Northern Naval Command’...”

“The ‘Northern Naval Command’...?” we asked in surprise.

“Yes. The Northern Naval Command at Delhi. You will understand what I am saying when you grow senior in service,” he said – and he suddenly downed his glass of beer down-the-hatch and walked off.

Later when I was posted to Delhi – I understood what the old “sea-dog” had meant.

Indeed there seemed to be more naval “brass” in landlocked Delhi – than on the high seas – or on the sea shores.

There were a large number of “landlubber sailors” who spent most of the naval career pushing files in Delhi – rather than sailing on the high seas.

These officers did go for sea tenures – but they just did the minimum specified sea-time required for promotion – and soon were back at their desks in Delhi.

Career-wise – these “Delhi-Centric Sailors” did much better than the true-blue sailors slogging it out at sea – or working hard in naval dockyards on the seashores. 

If you were in Delhi – you were in the “know of things” – and it was easier for you to “work” the system and get yourself promoted.

For all you know – if this “Delhi Centric” trend continues – a day may come when the number of Navy Admirals sitting in Delhi may outnumber the number of Admirals posted all over in the rest of India 

(Maybe this is already true – especially after the implementation of AVS Part 2 Bonanza – which created a large number of Flag Rank vacancies – most of them in Delhi)

I realized that the power centre of the Navy was in Delhi – and sailors at sea did not matter much.

As I said – if you were in Delhi you were in the “know of things”.

To me – it seemed to be a “Delhi-Centric” Navy. 

The fact that the navy is associated with the sea was almost forgotten by these “Delhi-Centric Sailors” – since the blue sea was a long way off almost two thousand kilometres away from landlocked Delhi. 

The Navy fights its wars at sea – but – in peacetime – more internal conflicts, internecine battles and turf wars are fought in the power corridors of Delhi.

Also – what we found most amazing (and amusing) was the metamorphosis in senior officers when they got posted to Delhi. 

The same formidable fearsome “Tigers” who roared at junior officers and sailors on ships acted like servile timid “sheep” in front of civilian babus and it was pathetic to see them grovelling even before section officers to get a file cleared (since their ACRs depended on it).

Soon –  I realized that this Delhi-Centrism applied not only the Navy but almost everything in India seemed to be “Delhi-Centric”.

Yes –  India is an increasingly Delhi-Centric Country even now.

Look at the electronic media, for example. 

Just switch on any mainstream news channel on your TV – and you will see how Delhi-Centric the news coverage is.

Delhi gets top priority in each and everything – sports, modernization, transportation, medical facilities, education etc – all schemes start from Delhi – whereas most of the intended beneficiaries may be located in remote areas of the hinterland.

This Delhi-Centric thinking seems to be the reason for many of our shortcomings and deficiencies.

Let us take the example of ex-servicemen (Military Veterans).

Whereas most of our soldiers come from rural areas – all Ex-Servicemen Facilities are concentrated in Delhi.

Retired Soldiers (ex-servicemen) are entitled to many benefits.

However most of these benefits remain on paper and cannot be availed of by the intended beneficiaries.

This is because most ex-servicemen live in villages and towns in rural or moffusil areas – and they have no access to the various facilities created for ex-servicemen like CSD Canteens, ECHS Hospitals, Social Amenities, Housing Schemes, Welfare Programs, Re-employment, Rehabilitation etc.

But if you live in Delhi – you have the best of CSD Canteens and Top Class Medical Facilities at the most modern Military Hospitals at your disposal. 

Since the decision making is centralized in Delhi – obviously the administration will be Delhi Centric.

If you live in Delhi you can avail of various Social Amenities, Ex Servicemen’s Housing Schemes and other welfare facilities since most of these are concentrated in the Delhi National Capital Region (NCR)

Even while serving – it is better to be posted in Delhi (or belong to Delhi) because you can get many things done through the “Delhi Network”.

Let me give you one more example of Delhi-Centrism.

I am of an academic bent of mind.

Long back – around 35 years ago in the early 1980’s – when I was posted in Delhi – I became a life member of an Academic/Professional Service Institution called the United Service Institution of India (USI).

USI – located in Delhi – had an excellent library which I fully made use of since I was an avid reader – and – I also attended many lectures, seminars and academic events organised by USI in Delhi.

After that – I was never posted to Delhi again – and my only connection with this august institution is the quarterly USI journal they send me by post.

The USI organises a number of academic events, lectures, seminars and has excellent facilities for study, research and recreation – but despite being a life member – I am deprived of the same since you can enjoy these events and facilities only if you live in Delhi.

Defence Services officers – serving and retired – live all over India.

So – I wrote to the USI a number of times asking them to open regional centres and organise events in other places too.

Sadly – I got no reply – and the USI continues to be purely Delhi-Centric.

It looks like living in Delhi makes you swollen headed too – your thinking becomes so “Delhi-Centric” that you care a damn about the rest of India.

I have realised that the Defence Services are getting more and more Delhi-Centric day by day – just count the number of Generals, Admirals and Air Marshals posted in Delhi – just see the Defence Facilities in Delhi NCR – and you will understand what I mean.

“DELHI-CENTRISM” – The Bane of India

Delhi has the best social infrastructure and excellent transport facilities like the Metro, the Best Airport and the best Railway connectivity. 

But the same cannot be said of most other cities of India.

Seeing the advantages of staying in Delhi vis-à-vis other places – I wish I had settled down in Delhi-NCR after my retirement as many of my friends and colleagues have.

This lopsided Delhi-Centric approach is having ramifications in other areas like politics too.

Centralizing and focusing on Delhi and neglecting other parts of the country has caused a sense of alienation – which has led to the rise of many regional and local political parties – and this splintering may not augur well for the unity of the nation as a whole in the long run. 

Maybe this Delhi-Centric mindset is a result of years of feudal administrative system and colonial rule which were exercised from the seat of power in Delhi.

The increasing disparity due to Delhi-Centrism is causing migration towards the relatively prosperous Delhi from impoverished rural areas and leading to increasing urbanization of India – which may not be a good thing in the long run. 

Delhi is the capital of India – and it can be understood that a capital must get priority – but the imbalance and disparity is too much and the gap is increasing day by day. 

This inequity causes alienation. 

To alleviate this problem – the rest of the country must be developed too.

What is the solution? 

Well – let me relate an anecdote which happened in the early 1980’s.

NO MORE “DELHI-CENTRIC” PROPOSALS

Around 33 years ago – when I was posted in Delhi – I remember a senior bureaucrat who used to keep saying: 

“I will not entertain any ‘DELHI-CENTRIC’ Proposals...”

He belonged to a Southern State and he was quite unhappy at being posted to Delhi – unlike most others who wanted to be in Delhi for all their lives.

Luckily – I had taken to him a project proposal which did not pertain to Delhi.

In fact – the project was in his home state.

He was delighted – and he recommended it with alacrity.

I think that is the answer to correct the imbalance:

“NO MORE DELHI-CENTRIC PROPOSALS”

Yes – let there be no more “Delhi-Centrism” – at least for the time being till those other underdeveloped parts of the country develop to a reasonable level.

Do you agree?

VIKRAM KARVE

Copyright © Vikram Karve 
1. If you share this post, please give due credit to the author Vikram Karve
2. Please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Please DO NOT Cut/Copy/Paste this post
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Disclaimer:

1. This article is a spoof, satire, pure fiction, just for fun and humor, no offence is meant to anyone, so take it with a pinch of salt and have a laugh.

2. All stories in this blog are a work of fiction. Events, Places, Settings and Incidents narrated in the stories are a figment of my imagination. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

Copyright Notice:

No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.

Copyright © Vikram Karve (All Rights Reserved)

     

© vikram karve., all rights reserved.