PAY SECRECY - Is it Ethical - SHOULD SALARY BE KEPT CONFIDENTIAL

PAY SECRECY – Is it Ethical?

SHOULD SALARY BE KEPT CONFIDENTIAL

Musings on Business Ethics

By

VIKRAM KARVE

A few days ago, at a social gathering, I met a young man who works as an investment banker.

I had heard that investment banking is a lucrative profession.

In my usual loud voice I asked him how much salary he got.

He looked at me aghast as if I had committed sacrilege.

Everyone around us looked at me in disbelief as if I had committed a great faux pas.

To whet my curiosity, I repeated the “indiscretion” by asking whoever I met his or her salary.

I was surprised to see that today’s youngsters are very secretive and unwilling to disclose how much they earn.

I observed this secretive nature, and reluctance to disclose salaries and compensation packages, across professions – ranging from nerdy IT “Techies” to Street Smart MBAs of all hues.

I just do not understand this “cloak-and-dagger” obsession with pay secrecy.

In the 1970’s, after getting our B. Tech degrees in Engineering, all of us in our class took up a variety of jobs, in the government and in the industry, in public and private sectors, in MNCs and PSUs.

Whenever we met we discussed our new jobs – and we freely discussed our pay, our salaries and what perks we got in our respective jobs. There was nothing to hide.

In those glorious “pre-liberalization” days of “socialism” it was considered ethical to be equitable and that is why salaries were comparable whether you worked in the private sector or public sector.

Yes, though the private sector paid more, there was no excessively disproportionate disparity in pay for the same type of work and level of posts between one place and another.

How things have radically changed with the advent of liberalisation and globalisation!

Today the concept of “equal pay for equal work” seems to have been forgotten and we see an obscene imbalance in compensation packages.

Those days, in the 1970’s, Salary Structures were simple – you got a basic pay, dearness allowance, some well-defined perks and, in some cases, publicly declared incentives and bonuses.

Everything was transparent and, to the best of my knowledge, such Machiavellian concepts like “Cost To Company” (CTC), ESOPs, and other “secret” allowances and “hush-hush” incentives and bonuses did not exist.

I feel that “pay secrecy” is a concept which is alien to conventional Indian ethos.

It looks like this “secretive” Human Resource Management Philosophy (comprising elements like “confidential salaries”) has become prevalent in India after 1991, post-liberalization, with the entry of foreign companies who have brought along with them their own distinct organizational cultures.

Can somebody please tell me what is the need for you to keep your pay secret or for your employer to keep confidential the salaries of employees?

Even today, as far as government jobs are concerned, pay, salaries and allowances are public knowledge. There is total transparency in pay scales, increments, and all payments made to employees in government and public sector jobs. I think that there is pay transparency in some large industries and traditional Indian organizations of the “old mould” as well.

Then why have this obsession with pay secrecy in some firms, especially in companies with foreign organizational cultures like MNCs and IT Companies?

It is said that an Ethical Human Resource (HR) Management System must have three attributes:

1. It must be FAIR

2. It must be JUST

3. It must be TRANSPARENT

The concept of pay secrecy violates all these three tenets.

Let me give you an example.

I have a friend whose son migrated abroad to the USA many years ago for his studies and continued to live and work in America.

He was “posted” to India by his company (an MNC).

Though the boy is of Indian origin, since he is based in America, he is considered to be an Expatriate (expat).

I was told that because he is an “expat” he gets a much higher salary and attractive compensation package for doing the same job as compared to his Indian counterparts.

In fact, he also joked that had he remained in India like his brother, or come back to India after his studies abroad, and joined the same firm, he would have been paid much less for doing the same job. 

(Whereas in India, foreign expats are paid more than Indians, the reverse may be true in America for Indian “expats” who probably are paid much less than their local counterparts)

Is this fair?

A fair system will ensure equitable compensation and will provide equal pay for equal work.

What is the justification for paying different salaries to employees of the same company for doing the same work?

Is this discrimination based on nationality just and moral?

In such a scenario you may have a ridiculous situation where a junior gets more salary than his senior just because they belong to different countries.

Is this absurdity not akin to racial discrimination?

I feel that openness is always better than secrecy, particularly in HR Management Systems which must be Transparent.

It has been my personal experience that a Transparent and Honest HR Policy nurtures a sense of Trust and Loyalty in employees.

Secrecy breeds distrust and creates an negative atmosphere of intrigue and suspicion in the workplace.

Such unhealthy and undesirable vibes create a sense of insecurity and disloyalty which in turn cause a feeling of stress in employees.

If there is workplace stress, people may not enjoy working in such an insalubrious environment and this is not conducive to friendly and open interpersonal relationships as well.

I feel that Pay Systems must be ethical and non-discriminatory.

A candid, sincere, fair and transparent HR Management System will inspire a sense of justice and harmony by ensuring equitable, fair and transparent compensation mechanisms for all employees.

Do you agree? What are your views on pay secrecy? Should salary be kept confidential? What are the pros and cons? Why has pay secrecy become the norm in most organizations?

Please comment. I eagerly look forward to your views.

VIKRAM KARVE

Copyright © Vikram Karve 2013

Vikram Karve has asserted his right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work. 

© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

Did you like this article?  

I am sure you will like the 27 short stories from my recently published anthology of Short Fiction COCKTAIL
To order your COCKTAIL please click any of the links below:
http://www.flipkart.com/cocktail-vikram-karve-short-stories-book-8191091844?affid=nme
http://www.indiaplaza.in/cocktail-vikram-karve/books/9788191091847.htm
http://www.apkpublishers.com/books/short-stories/cocktail-by-vikram-karve.html

COCKTAIL ebook

If you prefer reading ebooks on Kindle or your ebook reader, please order Cocktail E-book by clicking the links below:
AMAZON
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B005MGERZ6
SMASHWORDS
http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/87925

Foodie Book:  Appetite for a Stroll
If your are a Foodie I am sure that you will like my book of Food Adventures APPETITE FOR A STROLL. Do order a copy from FLIPKART:
http://www.flipkart.com/appetite-stroll-vikram-karve/8190690094-gw23f9mr2o

About Vikram Karve

A creative person with a zest for life, Vikram Karve is a retired Naval Officer turned full time writer and blogger. Educated at IIT Delhi, IIT (BHU) Varanasi, The Lawrence School Lovedale and Bishops School Pune, Vikram has published two books: COCKTAIL a collection of fiction short stories about relationships (2011) and APPETITE FOR A STROLL a book of Foodie Adventures (2008) and is currently working on his novel and a book of vignettes and an anthology of short fiction. An avid blogger, he has written a number of fiction short stories and creative non-fiction articles on a variety of topics including food, travel, philosophy, academics, technology, management, health, pet parenting, teaching stories and self help in magazines and published a large number of professional  and academic research papers in journals and edited in-house journals and magazines for many years, before the advent of blogging. Vikram has taught at a University as a Professor for 15 years and now teaches as a visiting faculty and devotes most of his time to creative writing and blogging. Vikram Karve lives in Pune India with his family and muse - his pet dog Sherry with whom he takes long walks thinking creative thoughts.

Vikram Karve Academic and Creative Writing Journal: http://karvediat.blogspot.com
Professional Profile Vikram Karve: http://www.linkedin.com/in/karve
Vikram Karve Facebook Page:  https://www.facebook.com/vikramkarve
Vikram Karve Creative Writing Blog: http://vikramkarve.sulekha.com/blog/posts.htm
Email: vikramkarve@hotmail.com

      

© vikram karve., all rights reserved.

 

DEMOCRACY - Then and Now

DEMOCRACY - Then and Now

Musings

By

VIKRAM KARVE

This happened sometime in the early 1960s when I was a small boy. 

We were travelling by train, going to our hometown for our annual vacation. 

The train stopped at a smallish station and an elderly man entered our old-style first class compartment. 

He was dressed in white khadi and he politely asked my father if he could travel with us till the next stop, a railway junction. 

It would be just a 20 minute journey, he said. 

My father welcomed him in and he came over and sat next to me. He carried no luggage, just a newspaper.

Soon, the train started and he made some polite conversation, inquiring about us, and then asked me about my school and my studies. 

I was curious so I asked him who he was.

“I am an MP,” he said quite unassumingly.

“What’s that?” I asked.

“I am a Member of Parliament,” he said.

“But what work do you do? What is your job?” I asked.

“My job is to look after my people,” he said.

Seeing my confused look, he added, “This village, the place I got into the train, is a part of my constituency. The people there have a water scarcity problem, so I had gone there to see for myself what I can do to solve their problem – I will try and get a bund or a tank built there.”

Then he began talking to my father about the backwardness of his constituency and the work he was trying to do to improve the quality of life for his people.

There is one sentence he spoke which I still remember: “If every MP looks after his constituency, then the whole country will automatically improve.”

That is the essence of democracy, isn’t it?

If all elected representatives sincerely serve their constituencies and work for the betterment of their constituents, then the nation would automatically progress.

Over the years the values, principles, ideology and philosophy which epitomize democracy have undergone a sea change and although there may be a few elected representatives who still believe in serving their constituency, by and large, the dictum today is “self before service” rather than “service before self”.

Dear Reader, wherever you live, look around and see, and ask yourself 5 Questions:

1. Is your elected representative (MP, MLA or Corporator) sincerely looking after your constituency?

 

2. Is he genuinely interested in your welfare and the welfare of all his constituents?

 

3. Is he making a significant contribution towards improving the infrastructure and quality of life in your constituency?

4. Is your elected representative easily accessible to you and does he listen to what you have to say?

5. In case you have a problem or grievance does your elected representative help you to resolve the issue promptly?

If your answer to all the five questions above is YES, please comment and tell us about the good work being done by your elected representative.

If your answer is NO, well then it is time to ask yourself a few questions.

SPIRIT OF DEMOCRACY

SPIRIT OF DEMOCRACY

Musings

By

VIKRAM KARVE

This happened sometime in the early 1960s when I was a small boy. We were travelling by train, going to our hometown for our annual vacation. The train stopped at a smallish station and an elderly man entered our old-style first class compartment. He was dressed in white khadi and he politely asked my father if he could travel with us till the next stop, a railway junction. It would be just a 20 minute journey, he said. My father welcomed him in and he came over and sat next to me. He carried no luggage, just a newspaper.

Soon, the train started and he made some polite conversation, enquiring about us, and then asked me about my school and my studies. I was curious so I asked him who he was.

“I am an MP,” he said quite unassumingly.

“What’s that?” I asked.

“I am a Member of Parliament,” he said.

“But what work do you do? What is your job?” I asked.

“My job is to look after my people,” he said.

Seeing my confused look, he added, “This village, the place I got into the train, is a part of my constituency. The people there have a water scarcity problem, so I had gone there to see for myself what I can do to solve their problem – I will try and get a bund or a tank built there.”

Then he began talking to my father about the backwardness of his constituency and the work he was trying to do to improve the quality of life for his people.

There is one sentence he spoke which I still remember: “If every MP looks after his constituency sincerely then the whole country will automatically improve.”

That is the essence of democracy, isn’t it?

If all elected representatives sincerely serve their constituencies and work for the betterment of their constituents, then the nation would automatically progress.

Over the years the values, principles, ideology and philosophy which epitomize democracy have undergone a sea change and although there may be a few elected representatives who still believe in serving their constituency, by and large, the dictum today is “self before service” rather than “service before self”.

Dear Reader, wherever you live, look around and see, and ask yourself: “Is  your elected representative (MP, MLA or Corporator) sincerely looking after his constituency? Is he genuinely interested in the welfare of his constituents? Is he making a significant contribution towards improving the infrastructure and quality of life in his constituency?”

If your answer is yes, please comment and tell us about the good work being done by your elected representative.

If your answer is no, well then it is time to ask yourself a few questions.