Humor in Uniform
HOW TO WRITE ACRs
Story of 3 ACRs
A
Fictional Spoof
By
VIKRAM KARVE
Disclaimer: This is a fiction story – an imaginary fantasy
“fairy tale” – and – this humorous fictional spoof is only for those with a “sense
of humor”
EPILOGUE
Once
upon a time – there existed a mythical country.
Like
all countries – that imaginary country too had a military – which comprised
officers and soldiers.
This
apocryphal military had a fictitious Human Resource Management (HRM) System.
And –
in order to facilitate the selection of the best officers to the “top brass” –
this imaginary military of the mythical country had a fictitious performance
appraisal system which was breathtaking in its simplicity.
Every
year – the immediate boss of an officer (called Initiating Officer or IO) wrote
an annual performance appraisal report – called ACR (Annual Confidential
Report) – on the officer being reported upon.
In
optimal harmony with “military intellect” – the ACR was a simple document –
easy to complete in a few minutes – with minimal strain on the brain.
Officers
were assessed on a 9 point scale (1 to 9 points) – with “9” points being for “outstanding”
performance – “5” points for “average” performance (during the one year period
of assessment) – and – “1” point being for extremely “poor” performance.
An ACR
with less than 5 points (4 points and below) was considered an “adverse” report.
Depending
on his assessment of the officer’s performance during the preceding year – the Initiating
Officer (IO) awarded the officer the points he deserved (from 1 to 9).
Then –
the IO forwarded the ACR to his boss in a sealed envelope.
The
boss of the IO (immediate boss) was called Reviewing Officer (RO).
The RO
reviewed the ACR initiated by the IO – and – the RO – in turn – forwarded the
“Reviewed ACR” up the hierarchical chain to his boss – the Senior Reviewing
Officer (SRO).
The
Reviewing Officer (RO) and Senior Reviewing Officer (SRO) were supposed to “moderate”
the report – however – in most cases – the RO/SRO endorsed the same points as
given the IO – but – in some cases – if they felt that the IO had been too
“generous” or unduly “stingy” in marking – the RO/SRO sometimes changed the
points up or down as per their judgement.
The
points awarded by the SRO were final.
The
SRO sent the ACR to Headquarters (HQ) – and – the ACR was duly recorded.
(Remember
– the “C” in ACR stood for “Confidential” – so the ACR was treated as a
confidential document – to be seen only on a “need to know” basis).
When
an officer was due for promotion to the next rank (as per his batch seniority)
– the average of his points in all his ACRs in his current rank was calculated.
This
was done for all officers in the batch – a merit list was made out – and –
depending on expected vacancies in the next rank in the following year – a “cut
off” point was decided.
Officers
whose “ACR average” was above the “cut off” point were placed on the “select
list”.
These
“select” officers were promoted to the next rank as and when vacancies arose.
The
remaining officers (whose “ACR average” was below “cut off”) were duly “passed
over” for promotion – ruthlessly thrown by the wayside – cast away from the
“rat race” – and these unfortunate “written off” officers spent rest of the
military careers in obscurity – stigmatized as “superseded officers”.
That –
in a nutshell – was – once upon a time – the apocryphal promotion system in the
imaginary military of the mythical country.
Dear
Reader – let me once again reiterate – that – the apocryphal performance
appraisal system mentioned above is fictional – a figment of my imagination –
and – resemblance – if any – to any system – past, present or futuristic – is
purely coincidental.
And –
the story I am about to tell you – is a spoof – pure fiction – an apocryphal “fairy
tale” – that happened – “once upon a time” – at a fictitious place – in the
imaginary military – of a mythical country.
STORY OF 3 ACRS
The RO (Reviewing Officer) had summoned the
IO (Initiating Officer) to discuss 3
ACRs.
The
conversation between the RO and IO was as follows:
RO: I am not happy with the way you have
filled up ACRs – especially on these 3 Officers – “A” – “B” – and – “C”.
IO: Why Sir…? I have filled up the ACRs objectively.
RO: Don’t give me bullshit. Is this the first
time you are writing ACRs…?
IO: Yes, Sir.
RO: No wonder you are clueless…!!! Let me explain to you – one by one…
IO: Yes, Sir…
ACR No. 1 – ACR of “A”
RO: Let’s start with the ACR of “A”
IO: Yes, Sir.
RO: You have given “A” a bloody “Nine-Pointer ACR” – are you crazy…? Does that idiot
deserve “9 Points”…?
IO: Sir – “A”
is the most outstanding officer in my unit.
RO: “Outstanding” – My Foot…!!! I can’t stand the sight of that conceited bugger…
IO: Sir – “A”
is highly professionally competent…
RO: So – what is so great about that…? Every
bloody Officer is supposed to be professionally competent. Have you seen his haughty
“Body Language”…?
IO: “Body Language”…?
RO: Yes – “A”
has rude “Body Language” – especially in front of his seniors. I just don’t
like the way he pompously swaggers around.
IO: Sir – I agree that “A” walks a bit robustly. But, Sir – “A” has good “Military Bearing”.
RO: Strutting around pompously is not
“Military Bearing”. Do you understand…? I have been observing “A” and his impertinent behaviour – he is
arrogant bugger who thinks he is too damn smart.
IO: Arrogant…?
RO: Yes – “A”
is an arrogant “showoff” – he needs to be put in his place – the haughty braggart
thinks he is a “know-it-all” – he tries to “overshadow” his superior officers
IO: Overshadow…?
RO: Don’t you remember how he made me look like
a laughing stock in front of everyone…?
IO: Laughing Stock…? When, Sir…?
RO: During that exercise – when the Chief was
there – I was making an important point – and – this bloody idiot “A” – he contradicted me in front of
the Chief – and – he made me look like a fool – everyone was laughing at me –
and – even the Chief made a sarcastic comment to me that I needed to brush up
on my professional knowledge…
IO: Sir – but “A” was right…
RO: So…? He could have kept his trap shut.
Officers are supposed to have “Tact” – and – your “A” certainly doesn’t have any bloody “Tact” – he is most
ill-mannered – and – have you seen his disgraceful demeanor – his appalling
“body language” – it is most inappropriate – I think he has got an attitudinal
problem. And – you want to give him a “Nine-Pointer ACR”…? Giving “A” 9 Points is most ridiculous – bring
him down to “6 Points”.
IO: Sir – you want to give “A” only 6 Points in his ACR…? Sir – that will be injustice…
RO: What bloody “injustice”…? The stuck-up bugger
deserves an adverse report. But – I am not asking you to give him an adverse report.
I am just asking you to lower his points a bit.
IO: Sir – 6…?
RO: Okay – since you like “A” so much – give him 7 – but – counsel him to improve his “Officer
Like Qualities” – I expect to see better OLQ from him in future …
IO: Sir – 7 – counselling – OLQ...? Sir – I
think…
RO: Don’t argue with me – you just do as you
are told – do you understand…?
IO: But, Sir…
RO: I haven’t got time to waste – now let’s
discuss this other case of gross over-marking of ACR by you…
ACR No. 2 – ACR of “B”
RO: And this Officer – “B” – why have you given him such a good ACR…?
IO: Sir – “B”
is a very good officer. Sir – even his “body language” is docile…
RO: He may be okay – but – what about his
wife…?
IO: His wife…?
RO: Yes – his wife – have you noticed how
“over-smart” she is…?
IO: Sir – “over-smart”…?
RO: Yes – have you seen the way she flaunts
her wealth – the way she zips around in her fancy luxury car…?
IO: Sir – that is her company car – that luxury
car has been given to Mrs. “B” by her
company…
RO: I know – we all know that Mrs. “B” works in a fancy MNC – for an
obscene salary – but – that doesn’t mean she has to undermine my status…
IO: What…?
Mrs. “B”…? She “undermined your status”…?
RO: Yes – Mrs.
“B” overtook my staff car this morning – she honked her horn loudly – and –
she brazenly overtook my staff car – driving in a most rash manner…
IO: Sir – she may not have noticed…
RO: Of course she knows it is my staff car –
can’t she see the “star plate” on the car – Mrs. “B” did it on purpose – just to “cock a snook” at me…
IO: Sir – she may have been in a hurry to work
– your staff car is quite old and your driver drives very slowly…
RO: Why are you trying to defend her misdemeanor…?
This is not the first time Mrs. “B”
has overtaken me – she had done it many times – even in the city. I am the
bloody “Station Commander” out here – and everyone has to give me due respect…
IO: Yes, Sir…
RO: That is not all. My wife – she happens to
be the “Senior Lady” out here – my wife has repeatedly complained that Mrs. “B” is rude, insolent and
ill-mannered…
IO: Sir – I don’t think Mrs. “B” can ever be ill-mannered – she is a most polished, elegant
and refined lady – I have observed that she has impeccable social graces…
RO: Oh – Ho – “polished – elegant – refined – impeccable
social graces” – tell me – why are you “batting” for Mrs. “B” so much…? Is there something…
IO: Sir – please. I was just saying that she
has social graces…
RO: You say she has “social graces” – then –
how come she is so “anti-social” on the “social front”…?
IO: “Anti-social”…?
RO: Yes – my wife says that Mrs. “B” did not attend even a single
Ladies Club meeting – nor does she take part in any “welfare” activity…
IO: Sir – Mrs.
“B” is a busy working woman with a full-time career…
RO: We know all that – okay – maybe she can’t
attend morning meetings – but – she doesn’t participate in evening events too –
do you know – she refused to take part in the “fashion show” and “group dance”…
IO: Sir – “fashion show” – “group dance”…?
RO: Are you trying to act dumb…? I am talking
about that grand “Husbands’ Night” function we hosted – when all the “big-wigs”
and their lady-wives had been invited – and – all the ladies were performing on
the stage – and Mrs. “B” was sitting
snootily in the audience – and that too in the second row – as if she was a “senior
lady”…
IO: Sir…
RO: And – that is not all – when my wife asked
Mrs. “B” why she was refusing to participate
in the fashion-show and dance – Mrs. “B”
passed some sarcastic remarks that she was a “professional career woman” and she
wasn’t keen on such “frivolous activities” like “walking-the-ramp” or “dancing”
in public on stage. I don’t care if Mrs.
“B” is a “hot shot” in the corporate sector – but she is a “military wife”
– and that too – she is the wife of a junior officer. How dare she call all
other military wives as “frivolous”…? She does not show due respect to my wife
and other senior ladies too…
IO: Sir – with due respect – we are discussing
the ACR of “B” – not his wife…
RO: I know – but – it seems you do not
appreciate the importance of a “lady-wife” in her husband’s career. Ah – now I
know why you are so clueless about these things – you are bachelor – aren’t
you…?
IO: Yes, Sir – I am a bachelor…
RO: How old are you…?
IO: I am 36 years old, Sir…
RO: 36…? Tell me – why didn’t you get
married…? Some problem…?
IO: No, Sir…
RO: Well – if you know what’s good for you –
you better get married – yes – if you want to rise in service – you better get
married fast – and – make sure you get a suitable wife with LLQ…
IO: “LLQ”…?
RO: LLQ means “Lady Like Qualities” – just
like Officers must have “Officer Like Qualities” or OLQ – Military Wives must
have “Lady Like Qualities” or LLQ – so get a suitable wife with LLQ – otherwise
– if you get a “militarily incompatible wife” like Mrs. “B” – you will be “written off” – like “B”…
IO: Sir – with due respect – ACRs are to be
written on “demonstrated performance” of the officer…
RO: Ha Ha Ha – “demonstrated performance” –
well – I haven’t seen the officer “demonstrating” any performance – but let me
educate you about the “demonstrated performance” of his wife…
IO: Sir…?
RO: Are you aware that – just last month – Mrs. “B” gave an interview to a leading
women’s magazine…?
IO: Yes, Sir – in the series of “women
achievers”…
RO: Let me read out what Mrs. “B” said when she was asked about her being a military wife –
“…I may have married a military officer –
but – I have not married the military – so – I resent being called a “military
wife” – I am a successful career woman with my own achievements. My husband has
his own military career – and – I have my own successful career in the
corporate sector – I have my own independent identity – I do not need the
crutches of my husband’s military rank – I am not “Arm Candy”…”
Isn’t
this most insulting – she is implying that all other military wives are “Arm
Candy – in fact – she is tarnishing the image of the service…
IO: Please, Sir – she has just expressed her
views – I don’t think she is tarnishing…
RO: Of course – she is spoiling the image of
the service – this Mrs. “B” – also – it has been brought to my notice that she
keeps writing all sorts of nonsense on the internet – someone told my wife that
she has a “Bog” where she writes all this rubbish which shows the service in
poor light…
IO: Sir – it’s “Blog” – not “Bog” – yes – Mrs. “B” has a Blog…
RO: I have heard that she writes inflammatory
articles trying to incite young military wives…
IO: Not at all, Sir – she writes in a humorous
vein – she writes spoofs…
RO: How do you know all this…?
IO: Sir – I read her blogs…
RO: Oh – you seem to be smitten by her…
IO: Sir – please… I think you should stick to
the point…
RO: Okay – I will stick to the point. The point
is that I am not happy with “B” because of the unbecoming conduct of his wife
which is tarnishing the image of the service – and also – I am not happy
because of her refusal to participate in social activities which are “part and parcel” of
military social life and the duty of every military wife…
IO: Sir, Please – How can an officer be judged
by the conduct of his wife…? And – how does a wife’s participation in social
activities reflect on an officer’s capability…?
RO: Listen – you stop arguing with me – I
haven’t got all day – as far as “B”
is concerned – just lower his ACR to “6 Points” – or better still – give him 5
– that’s final – and – now – let’s discuss this most important case of “C” – it seems to be a case of
“vindictive under-marking” of ACR…
ACR No. 3 – ACR of “C”
RO: I am astonished – you have given “C” a “Five-Pointer” ACR – do you know
what “5 Points” means…?
IO: Sir – “5 Points” means “Average”.
RO: Don’t give me bullshit…
IO: Sir – that is what is written…
RO: I don’t care what is written. With just this
one “Five-Pointer ACR” – this officer will be “written-off”…
IO: This Officer – “C” – he deserves to be “written-off”. Sir – professionally – he is
totally incompetent – and – as far as man-management is concerned – he was responsible
for near-mutiny conditions and I had to intervene. Sir – “C” deserves an “adverse report” – much lower than 5 Points – but –
I have been lenient…
RO: Are you really that stupid…? Or – are you
just acting dumb…?
IO: Why, Sir…?
RO: Do you know that “C” is the son-in-law of the Senior Reviewing Officer (SRO)…?
IO: Yes, Sir – I know that the SRO is his
father-in-law – but I have written C’s
ACR as per his demonstrated performance…
RO: Bloody hell – you are back again on the “demonstrated
performance” track…
IO: Sir – “C”
is a really bad officer – apart from his professional incompetence and
ineptitude in man-management – even his moral…
RO: I know everything about “C” – but – I have assured his
father-in-law that he will get a thumping ACR…
IO: Sir – how can you…?
RO: My Dear Friend – as far as “C” is concerned – do you know that his
father-in-law happens to my IO – and your RO…?
IO: Yes, Sir…
RO: So – if you know what’s good for you – just
raise “C” to “9 Points”…
IO: Sir – you want me to give a “Nine-Pointer”
ACR to “C”…?
RO: Okay – give him an “8” – I will raise it
to “9”…
IO: But, Sir…?
RO: Let me tell you that I am most disappointed
with the way you have written ACRs. These two officers – “A” (Body Language) – and – “B”
(Over-Smart Wife) – you have given them excellent ACRs – whereas – for “C” (Son-in-Law) – you have given him a
“lukewarm” ACR. You have done exactly the opposite of what I wanted. You should have
discussed with me before writing the ACRs – instead – you just wrote the ACRs
and sent them to me in a sealed envelope…
IO: Sir – as per the rules…
RO: Don’t try to teach me rules about ACRs – I
have written ACRs as IO for donkey’s years – and now – I have reviewed hundreds
of ACRs as RO. Since this is the first time you are writing ACRs as an IO – I will
pardon you for your ignorance. Come on – take back these ACRs – and – rewrite
them – you know what I want.
IO: Sir – you are the RO – you can give
whatever points you want.
RO: It will look bad if there is a difference
in IO and RO points. What will the SRO think…? It will appear that we don’t
agree with each other. We must be on the same page – at least – we must appear to
be on the same page. Do you understand…? Don’t be dogmatic – be pragmatic –
just do as I say – come on – take back these ACRs – and – rewrite them as I
have told you…
I wish I could have given this fantasy “fairy tale” a “fairy tale ending”.
But – Dear Reader – I will leave the ending to your imagination.
Tell me – Dear Reader – suppose you were the IO in this story –
what would you do…?
Would you be “dogmatic”…?
Or – would you be “pragmatic”…?
VIKRAM KARVE
Copyright © Vikram Karve
1. If you share this post, please give due credit to the author Vikram Karve
2. Please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Please DO NOT Cut/Copy/Paste this post
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.
1. If you share this post, please give due credit to the author Vikram Karve
2. Please DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. Please DO NOT Cut/Copy/Paste this post
© vikram karve., all rights reserved.
Disclaimer:
1. This story is a fictional spoof, satire, pure fiction, just for fun and humor, no offence is meant to anyone, so take it with a pinch of salt and have a laugh.
2. All Stories in this Blog are a work of fiction. Events, Places, Settings and Incidents narrated in the stories are a figment of my imagination. The characters do not exist and are purely imaginary. Any resemblance to persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
Copyright Notice:
No part of this Blog may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Blog Author Vikram Karve who holds the copyright.
Copyright © Vikram Karve (all rights reserved)
No comments:
Post a Comment